Trove
Sign In Sign Up

attorneys

Person
Mentions
70
Relationships
21
Events
90
Documents
32
Also known as:
Epstein’s attorneys
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
21 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Virginia Roberts
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Client
6
1
View
person Dashawn Robertson
Client
6
1
View
person A. Farmer
Professional
5
1
View
person the defendant
Client
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. ROBERT
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MR. ROBERT
Client
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
5
1
View
person defendant
Professional
5
1
View
person expert witnesses
Professional
5
1
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
5
1
View
person the defendant
Legal representative
5
1
View
person A. Farmer
Client
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
3
3
View
person Epstein Victim
Legal representative
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Client
1
1
View
person [Redacted Female Subject]
Legal representative
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
1
1
View
person JANE DOE #4
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2009-11-03 N/A Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel / Bruhnel Esquire Court Reporters, 51... View
2009-10-15 N/A Deposition of Larry Visoski. West Palm Beach, FL View
2009-10-06 N/A Deposition of Larry Eugene Morrison Unknown View
2009-09-16 N/A Videotaped deposition of Jane Doe #4. Master tape consists of discussions between attorneys prior... Unspecified View
2009-07-01 N/A Fundraisers held by the witness. Witness's home or office View
2009-05-29 N/A Hearing on Nonparty Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records Courtroom 11-F, Palm Beach ... View
2009-01-01 N/A Fundraisers held at the witness's home. Witness's Home View
2009-01-01 N/A Operation of law firm with 70 attorneys and surveillance system Law Firm Office View
2008-12-01 N/A Meetings regarding referring attorneys and maximizing business generation. Witness's office View
2008-04-17 N/A Code Enforcement Board Meeting Town of Palm Beach View
2008-02-20 N/A Deposition of a minor witness Palm Beach County Courthous... View
2008-02-06 N/A Deposition Unknown (Plaintiff traveled... View
2005-11-21 N/A Sworn statement/deposition of the witness. West Palm Beach, FL View
1992-01-01 N/A Mike Tyson Rape Trial Indiana View
0022-08-10 N/A Court filing date of the transcript. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View

DOJ-OGR-00020086.jpg

This legal document discusses the defendant's financial status and its implications for her bail conditions. It highlights that the defendant possesses significantly more assets ($22 million, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds) than initially reported, making her a substantial flight risk. The document also raises concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed bail bond, noting that some co-signers are UK residents who haven't offered cash or property, and the defendant's $7 million attorney retainer is presumed unspent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00025322.jpg

This document is an email chain involving MCC New York Associate Warden Charisma Edge and a redacted individual (likely a legal professional or specialized visitor) discussing the 'Last contact with Epstein.' The core content is a report from the redacted individual describing a visit to Epstein in the SHU on the Thursday prior (likely August 8, 2019). The visitor explicitly states Epstein denied suicidal thoughts, showed no signs of distress or anxiety, was interacting with a cellmate, and was making future-oriented plans regarding legal meetings and moving to general population.

Email chain
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005252.jpg

This legal document is page 3 of a court filing from October 18, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the court's reasoning for denying a defendant's request for attorney-conducted voir dire. The defendant argued for it based on significant pretrial publicity and the case's sensitive nature, but the court concluded that court-conducted voir dire is sufficient to ensure fairness and prevent potential prejudice, citing legal precedents.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005116.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008776.jpg

This document is page 70 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 50 regarding 'Uncalled Witnesses,' instructing the jury not to draw inferences from the absence of certain witnesses and reiterating that the defendant has no burden to produce evidence.

Court filing (jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008690.jpg

This legal document, specifically a jury instruction from a case filed on December 18, 2021, directs the jury on how to handle 'uncalled witnesses'. The instruction states that since both parties had an equal opportunity to call these witnesses, the jury should not draw any inferences from their absence. It also reinforces the legal principle that the defendant in a criminal case has no obligation to call witnesses or produce evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00025270.jpg

This document is an email chain dated August 10, 2019, the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death, discussing a staff member's last contact with him. The original message, sent from an AOL account, details a visit to Epstein in the SHU on the previous Thursday (August 8), noting that Epstein denied suicidal thoughts, showed no signs of distress, interacted with a cellmate, and was making future plans involving his attorneys and transfer to general population. Associate Warden Charisma Edge forwards/replies to this information.

Email chain / government record
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$4,900,000.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$4,900,000.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
2019-07-15 Received Citigroup Settlem... attorneys $4,900,000.00 Legal fees in exchange rate suit View
As Sender
12
As Recipient
13
Total
25

Legal analysis of Epstein's case

From: attorneys
To: Prosecutors

Epstein's attorneys prepared lengthy memoranda analyzing evidence and arguing nuanced legal points regarding federalism and federal criminal statutes.

Memoranda
N/A
Communication Source

Legal advice/representation

From: attorneys
To: ["Jane"]

The transcript mentions the witness's conversations with her attorneys, which are subject to privilege issues.

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Depositions and potential perjury

From: attorneys
To: AK

AK has a vague memory of attorneys contacting her to inform her about depositions, but cannot recall specifics or if perjury was mentioned.

Email or phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Counsel

From: the defendant
To: attorneys

5 hours per weekday; 25 hours per week total.

Video-teleconference (vtc)
N/A
Communication Source

In-person legal visits

From: attorneys
To: the defendant

In-person visits as needed.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

No Subject

From: attorneys
To: AUSA-1

After a February 2016 meeting, AUSA-1 received a limited number of emails from the attorneys.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Consultation

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: attorneys

Confidential communications compromised by guard proximity, camera repositioning, and sensitive audio recording.

Video teleconferencing (vtc)
N/A
Communication Source

Attorney-client communication

From: attorneys
To: GHISLAINE MAXWELL

Complaints about lack of privacy in open areas and poor ventilation in visiting rooms.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Review

From: attorneys
To: MAXWELL

Review of discovery materials

Video-teleconference
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Consultation

From: the defendant
To: attorneys

Calls placed from the day room phone.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Strategy/Info

From: attorneys
To: A. Farmer

Implicit discussion of attorney-client communications which Ms. Pomerantz objects to on grounds of privilege.

Privileged communications
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: the defendant
To: attorneys

Review of discovery materials and legal consultation.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Closing Arguments

From: attorneys
To: Jury

Attorneys asking jury to infer facts based on reason and experience.

Oral argument
N/A
Communication Source

Legal correspondence

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: attorneys

Emails sent/received via MDC desktop computer.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Testimony

From: CAROLYN
To: attorneys

Previous testimony referenced during cross-examination.

Deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Discovery in Giuffre v. Maxwell

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: attorneys

Two depositions designated confidential.

Deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Briefing Schedule

From: THE COURT
To: attorneys

Setting deadlines for factual investigation results (6 p.m.) and briefs (Midnight).

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pretrial motions information

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: attorneys

MDC refused Maxwell's request to speak with her lawyers the night before a filing deadline.

Request for legal call
2021-03-15
Communication Source

Attorney-client meetings

From: attorneys
To: MR. ROBERT

Unrestricted attorney-client meetings at the Albuquerque courthouse were rejected due to COVID-19 concerns.

Meeting
2020-01-01
Communication Source

Prosecution of Epstein

From: attorneys
To: SDNY USA

A presentation was made by attorneys in February 2016 for SDNY to prosecute Epstein.

Presentation
2016-01-01
Communication Source

Common Interest Privilege

From: attorneys
To: attorneys

Discussion regarding the existence of a common interest privilege agreement between attorneys as of this date.

Meeting
2014-12-30
Communication Source

L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: attorneys

Epstein claimed he did not recognize George Rush.

Deposition
2010-02-17
Communication Source

No Subject

From: witness
To: attorneys

Deposition taken.

Meeting
2009-12-04
Communication Source

Deposition Testimony

From: CAROLYN
To: attorneys

Witness testified under oath regarding whether she told the truth to the FBI.

Deposition
2009-01-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search