CAROLYN

Person
Mentions
1336
Relationships
426
Events
711
Documents
654

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
426 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
23
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
13 Very Strong
12
View
person Shawn
Friend
12 Very Strong
13
View
person Virginia Roberts
Acquaintance
12 Very Strong
10
View
person Shawn
Business associate
12 Very Strong
11
View
person Shawn
Romantic
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Epstein
Abuser victim
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Melissa
Friend
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Client
11 Very Strong
8
View
person Shawn
Acquaintance
11 Very Strong
8
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Abuser victim
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Ms. Comey
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
location Virginia
Recruiter recruit
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim abuser
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Abuser victim
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Acquaintance
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MAXWELL
Perpetrator victim
10 Very Strong
7
View
person MR. SCAROLA
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Epstein
Perpetrator victim
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Virginia Roberts
Recruiter victim
10 Very Strong
5
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Carolyn and Sean stole a car and ran away from Florida to Georgia. Florida to Georgia View
N/A N/A Massage appointments attended by Carolyn Palm Beach residence View
N/A N/A Carolyn and Ms. Roberts leaving Epstein's house after payment Epstein's House View
N/A N/A Visits by Carolyn to Epstein's home. Mr. Epstein's home View
N/A N/A Receipt of package containing lingerie and a movie. West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... View
N/A N/A Second visit to Epstein's property. Sean drove and waited in the car. Carolyn sat in the kitchen ... Epstein's Residence View
N/A N/A Defendant (Maxwell) entered massage room while Carolyn was nude and touched her. Massage room View
N/A N/A Trial testimony regarding Count Five and Count Three. Court View
N/A N/A Carolyn's second visit: Greeted by Sarah, Chef offered food, Sarah prepared table. Epstein's residence (implied) View
N/A N/A Carolyn dropped out of school in the seventh grade. Unknown View
N/A N/A Carolyn testified and wrote down her mother's phone number to avoid saying it aloud. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Visit to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. Palm Beach, FL View
N/A N/A Virginia and Carolyn enter Epstein's house for approximately one hour and five minutes. Jeffrey Epstein's home View
N/A N/A Massage encounter where Epstein masturbated in Carolyn's presence. Unspecified View
N/A N/A Carolyn visited Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 14. Jeffrey Epstein's house View
N/A N/A Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. Palm Beach residence View
N/A N/A Testimony given by Larry Visoski, Cimberly Espinosa, and Carolyn. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Carolyn turned 18, marking the legal end of the specific charged sex-trafficking conspiracy regar... Unknown View
N/A N/A Carolyn received a package via FedEx containing lingerie and a movie. West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... View
N/A N/A Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. Epstein's Palm Beach house View
N/A N/A Testimony given by Carolyn and Juan Alessi regarding the roles of Maxwell and Kellen. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Carolyn going to Epstein's house for massages. Jeffrey Epstein's house View
N/A N/A Carolyn observing Maxwell in the office area off the kitchen. Jeffrey Epstein's house (of... View
N/A N/A Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence; Defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia. The residence View
N/A N/A Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. The residence View

DOJ-OGR-00018815.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures a legal debate between attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca before the Judge regarding the admissibility of specific testimony or evidence (items 20 and 21). The discussion focuses on whether seeing a female naked in a massage room before Jeffrey Epstein entered constitutes 'lewd and lascivious conduct' or mere nudity.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018814.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Comey, and the judge. They are debating inconsistencies in the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, specifically regarding the timeframe of payments she allegedly received from Mr. Epstein and whether her testimony described sexual contact or merely being seen naked in a massage room. The judge ultimately suggests checking the official transcript to resolve the dispute.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018813.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. They are discussing the admissibility of specific questions (16 and 17) to be asked during a cross-examination, which concern visits to Mr. Epstein's home and any financial compensation received. The judge sustains an objection but ultimately indicates a willingness to allow the questions for a person identified as Ms. Comey.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018812.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to introduce paragraphs 207 and 208 regarding Sarah Kellen as impeachment evidence, but the Court sustains the objection. The judge rules the paragraphs inadmissible, distinguishing them from prior evidence because they do not mention Ms. Maxwell or other unnamed employees.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018811.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey before a judge. The discussion centers on whether a complaint's allegations are limited to a period ending in August 2003, which Mr. Pagliuca asserts is inconsistent with testimony. Ms. Comey counters that the complaint is consistent and suggests how to question the witness, Carolyn, on the matter.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018809.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The judge sustains a series of objections from Mr. Pagliuca related to specific numbered paragraphs (57, 63, 69, 75, 81, 87, 93) of testimony or evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018806.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, presided over by a judge. The discussion centers on whether a witness's testimony about the frequency of an act (up to four times a week) is inconsistent with a complaint stating it occurred twice a month. The attorneys debate the significance of the time frame and the conflicting frequencies mentioned in the testimony versus the complaint.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018805.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, before a judge. Ms. Comey defends a legal complaint against claims of inconsistency with a witness's testimony, particularly regarding the omission of certain details about 'sex acts'. The judge ultimately rules on the matter related to 'paragraph 39', sustaining an objection by finding a testified detail to be significant.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018804.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the cross-examination regarding a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court about inconsistencies in testimony regarding incidents in July 2002, specifically noting a lack of allegations regarding sexual penetration versus fondling. The Judge clarifies which paragraph of the legal document is being discussed (moving from 33 to 39) before turning to prosecutor Ms. Comey.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018803.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. They are discussing the consistency of testimony from a witness named Carolyn, specifically focusing on a discrepancy in the date of an incident. The judge points out that a complaint states the incident occurred in 2002, while Carolyn's testimony places it in 2001.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018802.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a dialogue between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the court. Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to impeach a witness's testimony by highlighting a chronological inconsistency regarding the start date of alleged incidents, claiming they occurred from 2002-2003 rather than starting in 2001 as stated in the indictment and the witness's direct testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018801.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, involving the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca discusses procedural matters with the Judge (The Court), specifically agreeing not to admit a certain item and mentioning a sidebar discussion needed to address where they left off.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018800.jpg

This document is page 202 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the admissibility of specific paragraphs describing Jeffrey Epstein's 'systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior' utilizing a network of employees. The Judge sustains an objection regarding paragraph 206, ruling it is not inconsistent with testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018796.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the cross-examination context of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court that there are factual omissions in the complaint compared to the witness's live testimony, specifically noting that the witness testified to 'penetration and intercourse by Epstein,' which was not included in Paragraph 8 of the complaint. The Judge questions Pagliuca on his theory of inconsistency versus omission and prepares to hear from prosecutor Ms. Comey.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument held without the jury present between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the admissibility of a 'state complaint' (Exhibit C4). The defense argues that the complaint should be admitted to show that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was not mentioned in it, while the prosecution objects on the grounds that this fact is not inconsistent with the witness's testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018793.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The page captures the moment the judge announces a 15-minute afternoon break to the jury, following the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The transcript was produced by Southern District Reporters, P.C.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018792.jpg

This document is page 194 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, focusing on verifying her signature on page 19 of Exhibit C8. The defense moves to admit Exhibits C8 and C9, to which prosecutor Ms. Comey objects, and the Court defers the ruling until a break.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018791.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to refresh the witness's memory regarding prior statements made under oath in 2009 and her answers to interrogatories, but the witness expresses confusion. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, and the court sustains her objections.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018790.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions her about her memory of answering written interrogatories for a lawsuit, which she claims not to recall. The attorneys and the judge then discuss showing Carolyn a portion of her deposition transcript to potentially refresh her recollection.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018787.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint Carolyn previously filed against Mr. Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Carolyn states she does not recall certain details of the complaint and denies having reviewed or approved it before her lawyers filed it in federal court.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018786.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examining a witness named Carolyn. The questioning centers on a paragraph from a 2009 federal complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, which alleges Epstein paid Carolyn $300 after an encounter. The transcript captures a legal objection by another attorney, Ms. Comey, which the judge sustains.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018785.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony, read from a legal filing, describes an incident where Carolyn was paid $300 by Epstein to observe a sexual act performed by her friend on him. It also mentions a subsequent telephone call where Epstein requested Carolyn return to his residence to give him a massage.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018782.jpg

This document is page 184 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is cross-examining a witness named Carolyn regarding a complaint filed on her behalf by attorney Mr. Willits in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully objects to the admission of defense exhibit C4 on the grounds that it is 'not inconsistent,' leading the defense to request a sidebar.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018781.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, where they are trying to locate Exhibit C4. The witness states the exhibit is related to her arrest, and another attorney, Ms. Comey, requests to approach the bench.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018780.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a previous legal complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf by an attorney named Mr. Willits in state court; specifically, Pagliuca establishes that this 91-page, 209-paragraph complaint did not contain a single mention of Ms. Maxwell's name.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$2,804,600.00
44 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
3 transactions
Net Flow
$2,804,600.00
47 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Sarah Kellen / Je... CAROLYN $600.00 Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Gift: Massage book for dummies View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $300.00 Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $300.00 Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $400.00 Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... View
N/A Received Victims' Compensa... CAROLYN $2,800,000.00 Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... View
N/A Received The defendant (Ma... CAROLYN $0.00 Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $300.00 Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... View
N/A Received Ghislaine Maxwell... CAROLYN $300.00 Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Epstein sent her gifts. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. View
N/A Received the defendant CAROLYN $0.00 Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... View
N/A Paid CAROLYN Shawn $0.00 Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... View
N/A Received Implied (Epstein/... CAROLYN $0.00 Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein (... CAROLYN $600.00 Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. View
N/A Received Mr. Epstein (impl... CAROLYN $300.00 Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein /... CAROLYN $0.00 Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... View
N/A Received Implied (Epstein/... CAROLYN $0.00 Money received for attending 'appointments'. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Over 100 paid sexualized massages. View
N/A Received The defendant CAROLYN $0.00 Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... View
N/A Received The defendant CAROLYN $0.00 Money for engaging in sex acts. View
N/A Received Implied (Epstein/... CAROLYN $0.00 General statement that 'we could make money' by... View
N/A Received Unnamed Older Man... CAROLYN $300.00 Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... View
N/A Received Implied (Virginia... CAROLYN $300.00 Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus View
As Sender
124
As Recipient
122
Total
246

Package sent by Federal

From: Epstein
To: CAROLYN

Package sent via Federal (likely FedEx); document mentions prior gifts included lingerie.

Package
2002-10-01

Unknown (context implies invitation)

From: Virginia Roberts
To: CAROLYN

Conversation occurring prior to visiting Epstein's house.

Conversation
2002-06-01

Package delivery

From: Epstein
To: CAROLYN

In or about October 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida.

Package delivery
2002-01-01

Package

From: Epstein
To: CAROLYN

Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida.

Package delivery
2002-01-01

Package delivery

From: Epstein's Office (New ...
To: CAROLYN

FedEx package (Govt Exhibit 803); testimony mentions lingerie

Package
2002-01-01

FedEx Packages

From: Jeffrey Epstein / Ghis...
To: CAROLYN

Packages sent from Epstein's office/New York to Carolyn.

Package delivery
2002-01-01

Package sent via Federal Express

From: Epstein
To: CAROLYN

In or about October of 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida.

Package delivery
2002-01-01

Personal Investigation/Grooming

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell asked about sex toys, future plans, and family history. Carolyn disclosed her mother was an alcoholic and family abuse history.

Meeting/conversation
2001-01-01

Scheduling

From: the defendant
To: CAROLYN

Setting up appointments for Carolyn to perform sexualized massages on Epstein.

Call
2001-01-01

Travel

From: Maxwell and Epstein
To: CAROLYN

Invited Carolyn to travel from Florida to a place outside of Florida with Epstein.

Invitation
2001-01-01

Massage appointments

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Scheduling massage appointments during the first year or two of Carolyn's visits.

Call
2001-01-01

Travel

From: Maxwell and Epstein
To: CAROLYN

Invited Carolyn to travel from Florida to a place outside of Florida with Epstein.

Invitation
2001-01-01

Age disclosure

From: CAROLYN
To: Epstein and Maxwell

Carolyn truthfully told both Epstein and Maxwell her age.

Verbal
2001-01-01

Travel invitation

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: CAROLYN

Invited Carolyn to travel from Florida to a place outside of Florida with Epstein

Invitation
2001-01-01

Scheduling

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages.

Call
2001-01-01

Appointments

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Setting up massage appointments

Call
2001-01-01

Personal life and travel

From: CAROLYN
To: MAXWELL

Carolyn and Maxwell had conversations at Epstein's house about sex toys, her future, her upbringing, her alcoholic mother, a person named Karen who was molested, and a travel invitation which Carolyn declined.

Conversation
2001-01-01

Scheduling massage appointments

From: Epstein, MAXWELL, or o...
To: CAROLYN

On multiple occasions between 2001 and 2004, Epstein, Maxwell, or an employee called Carolyn to schedule an appointment for her to massage Epstein.

Phone call
2001-01-01

Scheduling massage appointment

From: Epstein, MAXWELL, or o...
To: CAROLYN

On multiple occasions between 2001 and 2004, Epstein, Maxwell, or other employees called Carolyn to schedule an appointment for her to massage Epstein.

Phone call
2001-01-01

Massage appointments

From: The defendant (Maxwell)
To: CAROLYN

Calling Carolyn for massage appointments in Florida so that she could engage in commercial sex acts.

Call
2000-01-01

Call request

From: CAROLYN
To: JE

PLEASE CALL

Call
0003-02-08

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity