Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Sternheim

Person
Mentions
877
Relationships
86
Events
390
Documents
429
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
86 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Professor Loftus
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Elizabeth Loftus
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Mulligan
Professional
6
2
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Professional
6
2
View
person Unnamed witness
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Elizabeth Loftus
Professional
6
1
View
person Kate
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Loftus
Professional
6
2
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
6
2
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Co counsel implied
6
2
View
person Jury
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ghislaine
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Lundberg
Business associate
5
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Business associate
5
1
View
organization Defense
Representation
5
1
View
person DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Co counsel defense
5
1
View
person THE WITNESS (Loftus)
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Defense counsel implied
5
1
View
person Dr. Loftus
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
organization The government
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Mr. Hamilton
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Judge
Legal representative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings regarding finalization of the verdict sheet and jury charges in Case 1:20-cr-00... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of court document 761 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussio... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Ghislaine Maxwell formally waives her right to testify in her own defense. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference during Opening Statements Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-08-10 N/A Jury dismissal scheduling Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding A sidebar conversation during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to discuss the admissibility of te... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion rega... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding sidebar conference Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-08-10 N/A Medical Request Courtroom - Request for COV... View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding An opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine, where she argues that her client... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony of witness Loftus regarding memory science. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell context implie... Southern District of New Yo... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Conclusion of Professor Loftus's testimony Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial) Southern District Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Courtroom (Sidebar) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion cent... Southern District Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference during opening statements in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-08-10 N/A Courtroom discussion regarding logistics of presenting evidence on screens. Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Expert witness Lo... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings regarding jury instructions and upcoming witness testimony. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of Document 741 (Transcript of Opening Statement) Court (Southern District) View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
55
As Recipient
5
Total
60

Witness's positive COVID test

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter was apparently sent to the Court, mentioned by the judge, which stated that Ms. Sternheim's side had the witness's positive COVID test result.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Witness Testimony Objection

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussing objections to the relevance of testimony from upcoming witnesses called out of order.

Dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Checking on Mr. Hamilton's availability

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Mr. Hamilton

The Court instructs Ms. Sternheim to 'make that call' to check on Mr. Hamilton's availability, and she confirms she is doing so.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Format inquiry

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Inquiring if a specific format was satisfactory.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling concerns

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Confidentiality for Ms. Conrad's testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter submitted by Ms. Sternheim regarding Ms. Conrad's confidentiality, medical conditions, disciplinary proceedings, and intention to assert her Fifth Amendment right.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing and Fines

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the imposition of a fine, the status of a bequest in a will, and the formal imposition of the sentence.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding sentencing guidelines, probation recommendations, and culpability comparison between Maxwell and Epstein.

Court proceeding
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing of Ms. Maxwell

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["THE COURT", "Judge N...

Ms. Sternheim addresses the court during Ms. Maxwell's sentencing. She acknowledges the victims, confirms the judge can hear her, and begins to argue against the government's sentencing recommendation.

Courtroom dialogue
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Request to speak

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Request to stand at the podium and address the victims directly.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Defense argues for a lower sentence, citing the probation department's recommendation and comparing Maxwell's culpability to Epstein's.

Meeting
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Preclusion from cross-examination

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's decision not to use a photograph while a witness was on the stand prevented her from cross-examining the witness about nudity, a topic she considered relevant.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Testimony of next witness, Matt

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim raises a concern about the upcoming testimony of Matt, requesting that the government provide a proffer to ensure his testimony is compliant with the Federal Rules of Evidence and does not introduce improper statements.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Clarification on questioning a witness

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["THE COURT", "MS. POM...

Ms. Sternheim corrected Ms. Pomerantz, stating her intended question was not about the ex-husband but about whether the witness had asked a friend to plant drugs on the father of her child.

Court proceeding dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Objection to closing argument statement

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim argues that a statement made by Ms. Moe during closing arguments is incorrect. The statement claimed that a massage table from California affects interstate commerce, which Ms. Sternheim disputes as an inaccurate application of the law.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Opening Statement

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Ms. Sternheim describes the circumstances of Annie's meetings with Epstein in New York and Ghislaine in Santa Fe when Annie was 16.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Testimony of next witness, Matt

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim raises a concern about the upcoming testimony of Matt, requesting that the government provide a proffer to ensure his testimony is compliant with the Federal Rules of Evidence and does not introduce improper statements.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Opening Statement (Defense)

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Members of the jury

Ms. Sternheim begins her opening statement for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, by arguing that women are often unfairly blamed for men's actions and that Maxwell is not Jeffrey Epstein, despite the charges relating to his conduct.

Courtroom statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim responds to the Court's questions and begins to address the Court on a matter before being instructed to use the microphone.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a sidebar

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["Judge"]

Ms. Sternheim requests to raise an issue at sidebar with the Judge, and the Judge agrees.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relevance objection

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim objects to evidence based on relevance and foundation as a business record.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary objection regarding witness credibility

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

A dialogue between Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the legal basis for an objection to testimony. The Court argues that since Ms. Sternheim's side attacked a witness's credibility regarding her upbringing, the opposing side can bring in evidence to support it. The Court presses Ms. Sternheim for the specific rule (e.g., Relevance, 403) underpinning her objection.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Defense opening statement in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Jury/Court

The defense lawyer argues that the case is about Epstein's conduct, not Maxwell's, and that the government's case relies on four accusers whose memories are corrupted and motivated by money.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relationship between Ghislaine and Epstein, and Epstein's...

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Court/Jury (implied)

Ms. Sternheim describes Epstein's charisma and his relationship with Ghislaine, which evolved from friendship to her becoming his employee managing his real estate portfolio. She details his various properties and travel habits, and mentions that Epstein spent time with other women without Ghislaine.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Defense's argument against the credibility of accusers an...

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Court/Jury (implied)

Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's case lacks substantive evidence and relies on the thin, uncorroborated stories of four accusers. She suggests the accusers' testimonies are unreliable, having been influenced by lawyers, media, and the prospect of large financial rewards from the Epstein fund.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search