Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Sternheim

Person
Mentions
877
Relationships
86
Events
390
Documents
429
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
86 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
19 Very Strong
25
View
person Mr. Everdell
Co counsel
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
10
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
11
View
person Kate
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
14
View
person Judge
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
116
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Loftus
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Gill Velez
Professional
7
3
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Co counsel
7
3
View
person Ms. Conrad
Professional
7
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-08-10 Court hearing Cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her application for a U visa. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court regarding jury matters, including a response from the jurors, a confirmatio... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A sidebar discussion occurred during an opening statement in a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) reg... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Meeting Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Moe conferred during a break in the court proceedings. Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 745 into evidence Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, during which the judge and attorneys discuss the ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Meeting Attorneys were instructed to confer to narrow issues of disagreement. N/A View
2022-08-10 Court recess The court proceeding broke for a one-hour lunch break. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion during a court hearing about testimony related to exhibit 3505-005 and a request for... Courtroom in the Southern D... View
2022-08-10 Court hearing / direct examination Ms. Moe questions a witness (Matt) about conversations with 'Jane' regarding money received from ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Counsel and the court discuss pre-opening instructions and a potential issue with a prospective j... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion between the judge and counsel regarding a note from the jury and the schedule for fu... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A discussion in court regarding the scheduling of closing arguments and a charge conference, cont... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A legal argument took place regarding the use of extrinsic evidence to impeach the testimony of a... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Cross-examination Cross-examination of Kate regarding money for therapy and her acquaintance with Ray Hamilton. N/A View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A discussion during a court hearing regarding the admissibility of testimony from lawyers who att... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion between the judge and attorneys during a break in a trial, with the jury not present. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A discussion took place regarding procedural matters before calling a witness and the jury. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Jury dismissal The judge confirmed the unanimous verdict with Juror No. 119 and Juror No. 7, and then dismissed ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Trial Opening statements are being delivered to the jury in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. courtroom View
2022-08-10 Opening statement Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in a legal case against Ms. Maxwell, discussing the g... court View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A discussion took place regarding the procedural rules for the length and scope of the closing an... Courtroom in the Southern D... View
2022-08-10 Admission of evidence Government Exhibit 17 was received in evidence under seal to protect the identity of the witness. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A court proceeding for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE involving the direct examination of a witness named... Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
55
As Recipient
5
Total
60

Checking on Mr. Hamilton's availability

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Mr. Hamilton

The Court instructs Ms. Sternheim to 'make that call' to check on Mr. Hamilton's availability, and she confirms she is doing so.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Witness Testimony Objection

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussing objections to the relevance of testimony from upcoming witnesses called out of order.

Dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Format inquiry

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Inquiring if a specific format was satisfactory.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling concerns

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Confidentiality for Ms. Conrad's testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter submitted by Ms. Sternheim regarding Ms. Conrad's confidentiality, medical conditions, disciplinary proceedings, and intention to assert her Fifth Amendment right.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Witness's positive COVID test

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter was apparently sent to the Court, mentioned by the judge, which stated that Ms. Sternheim's side had the witness's positive COVID test result.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding sentencing guidelines, probation recommendations, and culpability comparison between Maxwell and Epstein.

Court proceeding
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Request to speak

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Request to stand at the podium and address the victims directly.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing of Ms. Maxwell

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["THE COURT", "Judge N...

Ms. Sternheim addresses the court during Ms. Maxwell's sentencing. She acknowledges the victims, confirms the judge can hear her, and begins to argue against the government's sentencing recommendation.

Courtroom dialogue
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing and Fines

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the imposition of a fine, the status of a bequest in a will, and the formal imposition of the sentence.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Defense argues for a lower sentence, citing the probation department's recommendation and comparing Maxwell's culpability to Epstein's.

Meeting
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Admissibility of Insurance Records

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding whether insurance forms constitute business records and what inferences can be drawn regarding Virginia Roberts.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Defendant's decision to testify

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Judge confirms with attorney Sternheim that she has advised her client regarding the right to testify.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding Exhibits 823 (employment notice) and 824 (insurance document) concerning Sky Roberts.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Requesting to wait until tomorrow.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit Identification

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: MS. POMERANTZ

Exchange regarding identifying exhibit K-8 / 3513-019.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Scheduling

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule over holidays and COVID-19 protocols.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect examination

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Professor Loftus

Asking if testimony would differ if called by the government.

Courtroom testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pending redaction issues

From: Ms. Moe
To: Ms. Sternheim

Spoke regarding pending redaction issues.

Conversation
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Documents 823 and 824

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding a personal action notice for Sky Roberts and insurance documents listing his dependents.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Confusion

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument that the jury mentioning New Mexico for a New York count indicates confusion not solved by simple referral.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relevance of Mr. Alessi's testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding inferences drawn from employment status versus physical presence of a child in 2001.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scheduling break

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Let's get started. My plan was to break at 3:30.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural discussion regarding demonstrative evidence

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the use of digital equipment to simulate a whiteboard due to COVID restrictions and whether a photograph of the work should be preserved for the record.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Loftus

Questioning regarding CV detail and compensation.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search