| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
27
Very Strong
|
45 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
19
Very Strong
|
27 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Accuser accused |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Roberts
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Accused accuser |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mike Tyson
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Claus Von Bulow
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
O.J. Simpson
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Arthur Goldberg
|
Clerk justice |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mishcon de Reya
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Guy Fronstin
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein made available then pulled back from Palm Beach Police Department. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz clerked for Justice Arthur Goldberg. | Unknown (likely Washington ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Alan Dershowitz and Detective Recarey regarding alleged police impersonation by i... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of defamation case between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maria Farmer observed Alan Dershowitz going upstairs at the mansion at the same time young girls ... | Epstein's New York Mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz and his wife at 'the island'. | the island | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz at his house in Boston. | Boston | View |
| N/A | N/A | Allegations made against Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Woman accused of being a sex slave by Jeffrey Epstein levels claims against his friends. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defamation lawsuits between Dershowitz and Edwards/Roberts | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Fundraiser for Vanessa Redgrave where Dershowitz distributed leaflets. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Debate on laws criminalizing Holocaust denial. | Canada | View |
| N/A | N/A | Teaching career at Harvard | Harvard | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Alan Dershowitz and David Boies where Dershowitz attempted to persuade Boies of h... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview on the Today Show regarding Matthew Hale's bar admission denial. | Today Show Studio | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounter | Unknown (context implies Ep... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned deposition where Alan Dershowitz and a special master will be present. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing involving Alan Dershowitz arguing before Judge Aldrich and Judge Julian regarding o... | Courtroom (likely Federal C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Von Bulow Case/Appeal | Courts | View |
| N/A | N/A | The O.J. Simpson Case | Courts | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz visiting Epstein's Palm Beach residence. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mike Tyson's Appeal | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Classroom discussions on rape law | Harvard Law School | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Interview | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz speech at Shriver Hall, Baltimore, interrupted by student protest. | Shriver Hall, Baltimore | View |
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). A witness is testifying about an event around July 2010 involving a client represented by themselves and Brad Edwards. The testimony is interrupted by a phone line, leading to the identification of Ken Sweder, Alan Dershowitz, and Darrin Indyke as listeners on the call.
This document is page 111 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. The witness testifies about unsuccessful attempts to depose an individual (implied to be Alan Dershowitz) in 2009, 2011, and 2013. The witness characterizes Dershowitz and 'Epstein's organization' as having a pattern of evading information requests and using stall tactics, specifically citing an incident involving the Palm Beach Police Department.
This page is a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 021933). A witness is being questioned about why they filed a motion accusing Professor Alan Dershowitz without contacting him first to verify facts or ask for refutation. The witness explains that the U.S. Attorney's Office had delayed answering a request for consent for months (dating back to Summer 2014), leading to a court filing on January 21, 2015. The witness begins to explain the decision not to contact Dershowitz as a 'cost benefit situation' before the page ends.
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation given the Bates stamp. An emotional witness (likely a victim) defends 'multiple girls' against attacks from the questioning attorney's side and requests a break. During the recess (4:01-4:04 p.m.), Mr. and Mrs. Dershowitz leave the room. Attorney Mr. Simpson then attempts to question Mr. Cassell, but is interrupted by Ms. McCawley noting the witness had stepped out for water.
This document is a rough draft transcript page (possibly from a congressional oversight hearing) discussing legal proceedings involving an unnamed defendant who invoked the Fifth Amendment and settled a claim with 'Jane Doe 102'. The speaker notes that attorneys Bob Josefsburg and Miss Isell specifically targeted Alan Dershowitz in their questioning during the depositions of Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez, implying Dershowitz had relevant information regarding the case, which is distinguished from a simple contract dispute.
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of testimony, likely before the House Oversight Committee. The witness recalls reading a Vanity Fair article in which Alan Dershowitz described a very close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, noting that Epstein was the only non-family member with whom he shared book drafts. The witness also notes Dershowitz's claim that his friendship was not based on Epstein's wealth (identified as a billionaire), stating he would walk the Coney Island Boardwalk with Epstein even if he had no money.
A page from a transcript where a speaker, identified as a former federal prosecutor and judge, discusses drawing adverse inferences because three women—Sarah Kellen, Miss Mucinska, and Miss Marcinkova—invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Alan Dershowitz. The speaker identifies Jeffrey Epstein as the 'kingpin' of an 'international sex trafficking organization' and notes that these three women, described as the 'next echelon,' were covered by a 'highly unusual' nonprosecution agreement.
This document is a page from a rough draft legal transcript (page 70) marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It records a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Scarola and Mr. Simpson regarding the conduct of Alan Dershowitz. Scarola complains that Dershowitz has been repeatedly 'jumping up' during testimony over the last two days, while Simpson attempts to downplay the disruptions, stating he only saw Dershowitz approach him once.
This is page 51 of a rough draft legal transcript, likely a deposition. The witness explains the difficulty of finding victims willing to testify about sexual abuse involving a 'very powerful person' linked to an international sex trafficking ring (contextually implied to be Epstein, with specific questions about Alan Dershowitz). The witness mentions collaborating with Mr. Edwards and notes that the Federal Government has also struggled with this investigation.
This document is page 45 of a rough draft deposition transcript bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. Attorney Mr. Simpson asks a witness if, as of December 30, 2014, anyone (other than Virginia Roberts) had told them that Alan Dershowitz abused minors. Attorney Mr. Scarola objects and instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client and work product privileges.
This is a page from a deposition transcript marked as a rough draft. An attorney, Mr. Simpson, questions a witness about whether they knew of any witnesses other than Virginia Roberts who could testify that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor at the time the witness signed a pleading on December 30, 2014. The witness asserts they were proud to sign the pleading and believed further discovery would identify witnesses, while Ms. McCawley interjects with a privilege objection.
This document is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an attorney questioning a witness about legal standards, specifically regarding a 'motion to strike' filed by Professor Dershowitz and the ethical requirement for attorneys to have a 'good-faith basis' when asking leading questions. The witness confirms their team's position regarding the motion and agrees generally with the premise regarding good-faith questioning.
This document appears to be a compilation of news reports, specifically from the Palm Beach Post in August 2006, detailing the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein and the conflict between his defense team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It outlines a potential plea deal involving 15 months in state prison followed by house arrest, details allegations from a 14-year-old girl regarding sexual abuse in 2005, and mentions recruiter Haley Robson. The text also highlights the defense strategy of discrediting Chief Reiter by attacking his mental stability and bringing up his personal divorce proceedings.
This document contains the text of a New York Post article from September 2007 regarding the legal case against Jeffrey Epstein. It details allegations of soliciting minors, the involvement of key figures like Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen, police investigations, and statements from Epstein's legal team regarding a potential plea deal and police conduct.
This document appears to be a compilation of media clippings, specifically from the New York Post, criticizing the plea deal Jeffrey Epstein received. It contrasts the aggressive investigation by Palm Beach Police with the State Attorney's decision to offer a lenient plea deal, attributing the outcome to Epstein's high-powered legal team (Dershowitz, Starr, Goldberger) and wealth. The text highlights that police had evidence (transcripts, phone messages) proving Epstein knew the victims' ages, but prosecutors were swayed by defense attacks on the victims' characters via MySpace logs.
This document contains the text of two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The editorials criticize Epstein's legal maneuvering, the delayed justice for his solicitation charges involving underage girls, and the aggressive tactics of his high-profile legal defense team.
This document appears to be an editorial or article criticizing the State Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the failure to charge him with crimes against minors despite police evidence. It details evidence found by police (school transcripts, trash), instances proving the girls were students (missing appointments for soccer or class), and the defense tactics used by Alan Dershowitz to discredit victims via their MySpace activity. It also mentions witness intimidation by private investigators and questions why a lenient plea deal was offered.
This document is a 2006 New York Times article (stamped by House Oversight) detailing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The police sought arrest warrants based on interviews with victims like Ms. Robson, but the State Attorney delayed, opting for a grand jury after Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) presented evidence attacking the accusers' credibility. Police Chief Reiter formally questioned the State Attorney's handling of the case, suggesting he disqualify himself.
This document contains the text of Palm Beach Post editorials from July 2008 criticizing the legal outcome of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights the disparity in justice for the wealthy, detailing Epstein's high-profile legal team (Dershowitz, Starr, Goldberger), specific allegations of abuse involving minors, and the perceived leniency of his plea deal and incarceration in county jail rather than state prison.
This document is an editorial from the Palm Beach Post dated August 4, 2006, criticizing the prosecution's decision to only charge Jeffrey Epstein with solicitation rather than crimes against minors. It highlights evidence found by police, including school transcripts and trash searches, proving Epstein knew the victims' ages. The text also notes the defense strategy led by Alan Dershowitz to discredit the victims based on their social media activity.
This document contains two transcripts of Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein. The texts detail the composition of his high-profile legal team, the filing of civil lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of minors (including specific details of abuse against a 14-year-old), and critical commentary on his plea deal and 18-month sentence in county jail rather than state prison. The document highlights evidence found by police, including school schedules in Epstein's trash, contradicting his defense that he did not know the girls' ages.
This document is a reprint of a Palm Beach Post editorial dated August 10, 2006, titled 'Massaging the system.' It heavily criticizes State Attorney Barry Krischer for referring the Jeffrey Epstein case to a grand jury rather than prosecuting directly, suggesting favoritism toward the wealthy defendant. The text details police findings, including payments to minors and physical evidence (school transcripts) found in Epstein's trash that contradicted his defense claims of ignorance regarding the victims' ages.
This document appears to be a news article or column critiquing the State Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case (circa 2006). It contrasts the overwhelming evidence collected by police—including phone messages, school transcripts, and witness testimony—against the prosecutors' reluctance to charge Epstein due to perceived victim credibility issues. The text highlights a controversial quote from a State Attorney spokesman admitting that wealth can indeed buy a different standard of justice.
This Daily Beast article details the legal maneuvering surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, highlighting the tension between local police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney (Barry Krischer). It discusses the involvement of Epstein's associate Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 agency in recruiting girls, the aggressive tactics of Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) against police and victims, and the eventual non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges despite a draft indictment threatening 20 years in prison.
This document is a printout of a 2010 Daily Beast article discussing the leniency Jeffrey Epstein received despite serious charges. It details former Police Chief Michael Reiter's deposition, which alleges interference by the State Attorney and DOJ, and outlines the recruitment of underage girls in Palm Beach coordinated by Epstein and his staff, specifically Haley Robson and Alfredo Rodriguez. The text lists high-profile associates who flew on Epstein's jets and his legal team, while noting the investigation identified dozens of victims across multiple international properties.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Harry Reems | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $0.00 | Legal 'fee' consisting of a signed photograph. | View |
| N/A | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | Unnamed Cab Driver | $0.00 | Paid the cab driver what his fare would've been... | View |
| N/A | Received | Paul, Weiss, Rifk... | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $100.00 | Weekly salary offer for a summer job (subsequen... | View |
| 2021-05-26 | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | CNN | $300,000,000.00 | Defamation suit amount | View |
| 2019-04-01 | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | Edwards and Cassell | $900,000.00 | Settlement for defamation lawsuit. | View |
| 2015-03-24 | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | Edwards and Cassell | $0.00 | Request for order to pay reasonable costs and a... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $0.00 | Dershowitz representing Epstein as a 'private, ... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Orin Kramer / Hed... | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $0.00 | Restitution of lost investment funds following ... | View |
Denied ever getting a massage from anybody.
Requested documents proving Dershowitz's claims of innocence.
Dershowitz claimed he investigated the allegations in a day and could prove them false.
Called Jane Doe No. 3 a serial liar and lawyers sleazy/unprofessional.
Claimed he never flew with a young woman and always flew with his wife.
Claimed he had not sexually abused Jane Doe No. 3 and that minimal investigation would prove it.
Dershowitz denies allegations, claims accuser lied about him, Clinton, and Prince Andrew, and calls for all evidence to be made public.
Asserted relationship was entirely professional and denied being 'chummy'.
Dershowitz sent a 'highly confidential' memo spelling out legal strategy, copying Sires.
Dershowitz denied allegations in an interview with POLITICO.
Dershowitz reflects on his principles, representation of controversial figures, and desire to have the 'last word' on his record.
Stating multiple individuals placed Dershowitz in the presence of Epstein and underage females.
Stating belief that Dershowitz personally observed Epstein with underage females.
Defended the right of professors to call for boycotts while criticizing their ideas.
Dershowitz apologizes for the delay, mentions recent work in NY and Georgetown, and discusses a potential call to the sheriff regarding Epstein's sentence handling, suggesting they put the call off for a while.
Dershowitz met with prosecutors to undermine the credibility of the accusers based on their Myspace activity.
Presentation of printouts from victims' Myspace pages.
A letter from Alan Dershowitz was delivered in a package. It offered assistance in providing witnesses and addressed an allegation that one of Epstein's private investigators impersonated a police officer.
Would like to set meeting with Mr K this week. Will call you back.
Phone call received at 9:55 AM from (617) 661-1965
Dershowitz stated he sends book drafts only to Jeffrey Epstein outside his family.
Request to represent them in efforts to fly the Palestinian flag at Harvard Yard following Arafat's death.
A 2.0 lbs FedEx Pak was sent from 457 Madison Ave, NY to Alan Dershowitz. It was picked up on Nov 11, 2002 and delivered on Nov 13, 2002 after an initial attempt failed due to an incorrect address.
Dershowitz pleaded to draft an opinion reversing the conviction; Bazelon agreed on the condition a valid legal basis was found.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity