Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MR. ROHRBACH

Person
Mentions
523
Relationships
69
Events
254
Documents
254
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
69 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The government
Professional
6
1
View
person William Brown
Witness examiner
5
1
View
person Ms. Gill
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Brown
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization The Court
Judicial
5
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Representative
5
1
View
person Paul Kane
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Mr. Flatley
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization The government
Representation
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Defense counsel
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person Ms. Gill
Professional
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
5
1
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional opposing counsel
5
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Paul Kane
Professional
5
1
View
person JANINE GILL VELEZ
Professional
5
1
View
person Besselsen
Professional
5
1
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person Janine Gill Velez
Professional
5
1
View
person DANIEL ALAN BESSELSEN
Professional
5
1
View
person Mr. Flatley
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Tracy Chapell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Janine Gill Velez Courtroom View
N/A N/A Briefing on Government Exhibit 52. Unspecified View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding witness recall and sequestration violations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding admissibility of technical testimony about CD burning and file dates (cre... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Paul Kane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Lisa Rocchio Courtroom View
N/A Court examination Direct examination of WILLIAM BROWN by Mr. Rohrbach, starting on page 2042. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Examination of witness Tracy Chapell, including direct examination and cross-examination, as part... Southern District Court (im... View
N/A Court examination Direct examination of witness DANIEL ALAN BESSELSEN by Mr. Rohrbach. N/A View
N/A Court hearing A court hearing took place where the disclosure of expert witness opinions was discussed. Courtroom View
N/A Deadline A deadline was set for the defense to provide the opinions of their expert witness. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Direct examination of witness JANINE GILL VELEZ by Mr. Rohrbach. N/A View
N/A Court proceeding A discussion in court between the judge and attorneys regarding the admissibility of evidence and... Courtroom View
2025-01-15 N/A Court hearing involving cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio. Southern District Court View
2025-01-15 N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 2 into evidence Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing (filing date) regarding the admissibility of evidence (contact book vs household ma... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding jury instructions (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), specifically discussing Instr... Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of court document 761 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Discussion of Exhibits 823 and 824 Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding regarding jury instructions in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Southern District of New York View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) discussing legal text and jury instructions. Southern District (New York) View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing date of the court transcript document. Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00011645.jpg

A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Ms. Menninger), and the Judge regarding expert witness Mr. Flatley. The discussion focuses on the scope of Mr. Flatley's expertise, specifically regarding forensic principles, digital document storage, and metadata, and whether proper notice was given to the defense regarding his opinions. The Judge instructs that any differing expert opinions on these technical matters must be noticed.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011644.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated August 10, 2022) involving a legal debate over witness testimony. Ms. Menninger argues that the government did not provide sufficient notice regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony concerning the extraction of user data and metadata, claiming the '3500 material' was insufficient. Mr. Rohrbach responds that while they view Flatley primarily as a fact witness, they provided expert notice due to the blurred lines between fact and expert testimony in this technical context.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011643.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge, Ms. Menninger, and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the rules for disclosing expert testimony and the scope of evidence contained on several hard drives marked as exhibits. The attorneys debate the government's representations about which documents will be used, and Mr. Rohrbach clarifies that a witness, Mr. Kelso, will testify on the general principles of document creation.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011642.jpg

This document is a partial court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, discussing the anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley. His testimony concerns the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home, and the possibility of Mr. Kelso serving as a rebuttal witness. The government and defense are preparing for this testimony and related disclosures, with Mr. Flatley having given similar testimony in other cases.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
53
As Recipient
3
Total
56

Insurance records

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: Ms. Gill

Mr. Rohrbach states he will 'go have a conversation with Ms. Gill about this' (referring to records).

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Surprise at receiving the defendant's filing.

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Mr. Rohrbach mentions a letter his side sent, which indicated they were surprised to receive a filing from the defendant.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether personnel forms constitute hearsay or business records.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the docketing of a letter with proposed redactions.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Closing Arguments

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the 'empty chair' argument and government motivations.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary basis for comments on witness interviews

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach, for the government, argues that Ms. Menninger's comments about how witness interviews were conducted are supported by evidence from Special Agent Young's testimony, which was elicited by Ms. Comey. The Court disagrees and overrules the government's request.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of evidence, specifically a deposition tran...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Mr. Rohrbach argues for the admission of a deposition transcript of Mr. Epstein concerning a move in 1996, comparing the issue to a matter involving 44 Kinnerton Street.

Court hearing
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Argument for relevance of documents

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach argues that documents, such as a birth certificate, are relevant to connect Virginia Roberts (daughter of Sky Roberts) to the person who was present at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, corroborating testimony from Juan Alessi and Carolyn.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Details of a package shipment from 2002

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Ms. Chapell"]

Mr. Rohrbach questions witness Ms. Chapell about the sender's address, recipient's first name, delivery location, and shipment date of a package sent on December 3, 2002. They also refer to Government Exhibits GX-11 and GX-803/801.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of a document under the business records ex...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach argues that a document should be admitted into evidence because it was used in cross-examination and qualifies as an 'adoptive business record' of a school, as the school integrated it into its files and relied upon it.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Argument against defendant's motion on enticement charges...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach argues that the defendant's motion should be denied because the defendant built a relationship with 'Jane' over a multi-year period by playing on her hopes and desires, which constitutes enticement and persuasion leading to her travel to New York.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Impeachment of witness Juan Alessi

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["Your Honor"]

Mr. Rohrbach argues against the impeachment, stating that the details of the prior burglary are a collateral matter and not central to the current trial.

Sidebar conversation (in-person)
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Withdrawal of request regarding Counts Five and Six

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding statutory language 'foreign commerce' and editing jury instructions/charges.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of record 824

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding legal citation and business records exception for Exhibit 824.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Legal argument on conspiracy charges and the Mann Act

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach agrees with the Court's summary and adds a point about 'minor Victim 2' being charged only with conspiracy, arguing that events in New Mexico are relevant to proving intent for illegal sexual activity in New York under the Mann Act.

Court hearing dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Update on factual investigation and witness list

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Rohrbach informs the court that the government cannot complete its investigation by 6 o'clock, partly because Jane's counsel is unavailable, and therefore elects not to call Brian as a witness. He also states the government does not believe any court rule has been violated.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Verdict Sheet Edit

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Requesting to change a 'T' in parentheses to a checkmark on the verdict sheet.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: William Brown

Questioning regarding the witness's employment.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: Gill Velez

Questioning regarding the authenticity of personnel records for Sky Roberts.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence (Exhibit 823)

From: THE COURT
To: MR. ROHRBACH

Discussion regarding the relevance of Sky Roberts' employment records and phone numbers to link Virginia Roberts to Mar-a-Lago.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Response to application

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Drafting response expected by lunch break.

Legal response
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: MR. ROHRBACH

Discussion regarding instructions for alleged victim Kate and New Mexico law.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of testimony regarding photos found during ...

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion clarifying if the witness can testify about seeing photos of celebrities and nude artwork without the government introducing the physical photos as exhibits.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: MS. MENNINGER

Discussion regarding delaying Brian's testimony.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of exhibits 823 and 824

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Oral argument regarding whether exhibit 824 adds value beyond 823 and the need to speak with Ms. Gill.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search