David Boies
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Amanda Kramer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Professor Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
identified victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
identified victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
women (unnamed accusers)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David S. Stone
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Opposing counsel negotiating parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. McCAWLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA-1
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stanley Pottinger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ellen Brockman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Eytan Avriel
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Dinner meeting involving The Clintons, Harvey Weinstein, Georgina Chapman, and David Boies | Rao's in Harlem | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Boies, Pottinger, Kessler, and NYT reporters. | BSF Office, Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Private admission by David Boies regarding false accusations. | Private setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged timeframe for the 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner claimed by Dershowitz. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Alan Dershowitz and David Boies where Dershowitz attempted to persuade Boies of h... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Meeting | David Boies approached the government to ask if the Southern District would consider charging Max... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A civil case was proceeding against the Defendant (Mr. Epstein). | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-26 | N/A | Conversation between AUSA and David Boies/Sigrid McCawley regarding press conduct during trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Upcoming arraignment/conference (implied date based on context of 'upcoming') | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-04-21 | N/A | Arraignment Conference | Court (Physical and Phone) | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley representing victims. | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Attorney David Boies filed a Notice of Appearance in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Notice of Appearance filed for David Boies on behalf of victims. | SDNY | View |
| 2020-05-18 | N/A | Plaintiff Annie Farmer files opposing response to Ghislaine Maxwell's request for pre-motion conf... | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-02-12 | N/A | David Boies denies defaming Alan Dershowitz regarding Epstein remarks. | Court Filing | View |
| 2019-11-30 | N/A | Publication of New York Times article regarding David Boies, Pottinger, and Jeffrey Epstein video... | New York Times (Online) | View |
| 2019-11-30 | N/A | New York Times publishes investigative report 'Jeffrey Epstein, Blackmail, and a Lucrative Hot Li... | New York Times (Publication) | View |
| 2019-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by David Boies | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-01 | N/A | Episode 22 of 'The Weekly' airs featuring interviews with Boies and Pottinger. | FX / Hulu | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Public hearing where Ms. Giuffre and Mr. Boies had a right to be heard under 18 U.S.C. § 3771. | Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | Hearing | A court hearing in the case of United States v. Epstein, where the court commented on an article ... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Hearing in United States v. Epstein | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Public hearing in US v. Epstein | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding for case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, where the listed individuals were present. | Southern District | View |
| 2019-07-15 | Court testimony | David Boies advised the Court about witnesses being contacted by Mr. Epstein or his lawyers and s... | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000810.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against the release of the defendant, Mr. Epstein, pending trial. It presents evidence that he is a serious flight risk due to his wealth, international travel, and significant ties to Brazil, a country without an extradition treaty with the U.S. The document also cites allegations of witness tampering made by victims' attorney David Boies and concludes that no conditions, including an armed guard, would be sufficient to ensure Mr. Epstein's appearance at trial, labeling him a danger to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00000793.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the pretrial release of Mr. Epstein, asserting he is a danger to the community. It cites testimony from a bail hearing on July 15, 2019, where a victim, Annie Farmer, stated she met Epstein as a minor, was flown to New Mexico, and that he was 'inappropriate' with her. The document uses this testimony to support the government's position that Epstein's release would result in the harassment and abuse of victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000728.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal document filed on September 4, 2019, in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Epstein). Judge Richard M. Berman addresses an unnamed recipient regarding an opinion piece they wrote, criticizing it for potentially discouraging Ms. Giuffre and her attorney David Boies from speaking at an August 27, 2019 hearing. The document copies attorneys Maurene Comey, Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and David Boies.
DOJ-OGR-00000726.jpg
Fordham law professor Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Richard M. Berman to correct a misunderstanding from an August 27, 2019, hearing in the case *United States v. Epstein*. Green clarifies that, contrary to the court's apparent understanding, he has never served as counsel for Epstein or his estate. He explains that his only involvement in a related matter was serving as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate defamation case, a role that concluded in June 2019 and did not involve representation or advocacy.
DOJ-OGR-00000512.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 24, 2019. It is a continuation of the 'APPEARANCES' section, listing individuals present for the legal proceeding. Those listed include David Boies, Brad Edwards, and representatives from the NYPD, FBI, and U.S. Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00000498.jpg
This document is a page from a court order filed on July 18, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The Court rules that Epstein presents a serious flight risk and a danger to the community, citing his alleged sex crimes with minors and witness tampering. The document references a statement by attorney David Boies regarding Epstein's history of contacting cooperating witnesses to stop their cooperation, and cites legal precedents (including a 2001 case also named United States v. Epstein) to justify denying release.
DOJ-OGR-00000481.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the court's finding that Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community. It details that victims have expressed fear for their safety should he be released and highlights the testimony of one victim, Annie Farmer. Ms. Farmer, represented by counsel David Boies, testified that she met Epstein at age 16, was flown to New Mexico, and that he was 'inappropriate' with her, leading her to oppose his pretrial release.
DOJ-OGR-00000451.jpg
This document is page 7 of a defense letter to Judge Berman dated July 16, 2019. It addresses two specific points: 1) Refuting Mr. Boies' speculation that payments in late 2018 were to cooperating witnesses, clarifying instead that they were to employees/friends who invoked the Fifth Amendment; and 2) Dismissing the government's concern over an Austrian passport, noting it expired 32 years ago and was never used. The document emphasizes Epstein's religious background in the context of acquiring said passport.
DOJ-OGR-00020650.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, detailing legal filings from March 24 to March 29, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP appearing for victims, the prosecution (USA) and defense counsel filing letters with Judge Alison J. Nathan, and the filing of a superseding indictment against Maxwell. The docket also records a motion to appear pro hac vice and a related $200 filing fee.
DOJ-OGR-00020512.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's order regarding the handling of subpoenas involving alleged victims, specifically requiring a law firm (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) to coordinate with defense counsel on redactions and objections. The docket also records Maxwell's Notice of Appeal, the filing of several sealed documents, and the formal appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00002381.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated March 4, 2016, associated with Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, specifically signed by Sigrid McCawley, and lists contact information for attorneys David Boies and Ellen Brockman. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00002381).
DOJ-OGR-00002381(1).jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated March 4, 2016, submitted by the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP. It lists attorneys Sigrid McCawley, David Boies, and Ellen Brockman with their respective office addresses in Florida and New York. The header indicates this document relates to civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell) and was later filed as an exhibit in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Maxwell).
DOJ-OGR-00002361.jpg
This document is page 9 (filed as page 14 of 23) of a legal filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It discusses David Boies' frustration that the government initially failed to pursue perjury charges against Maxwell despite his belief they had her 'dead to rights.' The filing argues that a redacted individual (likely a judge, referred to as 'she') modified a protective order based on misrepresentations made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney. A large portion of the page is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002361(1).jpg
This is page 14 of a legal filing (Document 134) from the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government previously failed to act on perjury charges despite attorney David Boies claiming they had Maxwell 'dead to rights.' The filing alleges that a judicial officer (name redacted) was misled by an Assistant U.S. Attorney's misrepresentations, leading to the modification of a Protective Order. A large portion of the page is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government's prior representations about its investigation were false. It details how attorneys from Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, providing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies highlights his firm's conviction that they could prove a "massive sex trafficking ring" was in operation.
DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
This legal document page, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government was aware of information beyond public filings when it began its investigation. It cites a February 29, 2016 meeting where attorneys from Boies Schiller urged AUSA Amanda Kramer to investigate Epstein and Maxwell, and a later approach in summer 2016 by David Boies himself asking the government to consider perjury charges against Maxwell. The document includes a quote from Boies stating they had evidence of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00002360(2).jpg
This legal document argues that the government's representations about when it began its investigation were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from the law firm Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, citing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies details the extensive evidence they claimed to possess about a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00002360(1).jpg
This legal document argues that the government's claims about when its investigation began were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from Boies Schiller met with AUSA Amanda Kramer on February 29, 2016, to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. Furthermore, it states that David Boies approached the government in the summer of 2016 to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury, quoting Boies on the extensive evidence they had of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00019494.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, details arguments following Ghislaine Maxwell's detention hearing. It heavily features comments from David Boies, a lawyer for an accuser named Farmer, who criticizes Maxwell's potential 'blame the victim' defense strategy as counterproductive. Boies recounts his client's allegations, including a story about how Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly lured a 16-year-old girl named Annie to a ranch in New Mexico with fraudulent promises.
DOJ-OGR-00019493.jpg
This page from a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that government officials (Ms. Strauss and FBI Agent William Sweeney) and private attorneys (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, and Bradley Edwards) made prohibited, prejudicial public statements regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The document cites specific quotes comparing Maxwell to a 'snake' and 'villain,' as well as speculation about her potential cooperation with prosecutors to implicate other 'wealthy and influential people.' The filing asserts these comments violate Local Rule 23.1.
DOJ-OGR-00019319.jpg
This document is the third page of a legal letter from attorney David Boies to Judge Debra C. Freeman, dated May 18, 2020, regarding a civil case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Boies argues that the court should deny Maxwell's motion to stay discovery and her request for a pre-motion conference, citing Judge Schofield's previous comments that Maxwell's motion to dismiss lacks merit. The letter also asserts that the existence of the Epstein Estate's Victim Compensation Fund (in the Virgin Islands probate court) is not a valid reason to stay the current action without the Plaintiff's consent.
DOJ-OGR-00019317.jpg
This is a legal letter from attorney David Boies representing plaintiff Annie Farmer, addressed to Judge Debra C. Freeman on May 18, 2020. The letter argues against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery in the civil case pending a criminal investigation, citing case law that characterizes such stays as extraordinary remedies when no indictment has yet been issued. Boies asserts that Maxwell's motion is an unjustified attempt to delay litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00003024.jpg
This legal document describes a February 2016 meeting where attorneys presented information to an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA-1) about individuals connected to Epstein, with a focus on Maxwell. It asserts that because this meeting pre-dated the depositions central to the current indictment, the attorneys could not have alleged perjury related to those specific depositions at that time. The document also notes AUSA-1's lack of recall regarding specific perjury discussions involving Maxwell and details the government's subsequent review of AUSA-1's emails for related communications.
DOJ-OGR-00005550.jpg
This document summarizes the recollections of 'AK,' a Human Trafficking Coordinator, regarding potential investigations into Epstein at SDNY. AK denies that attorneys urged an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell as a 'duo,' stating the focus was on Epstein and Maxwell was only mentioned in passing. AK also denies ever meeting or speaking with attorney David Boies and has no memory of a second meeting on the subject in the summer of 2016.
DOJ-OGR-00002804.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney David Boies of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP is formally notifying the court that he is appearing as counsel for his firm (as an Intervenor) and for the unnamed victims the firm represents in this matter.
Maxwell Perjury Evidence
We have her dead to rights.
Statements about Ms. Maxwell's potential cooperation
Attorney David Boies made public statements speculating that Maxwell would be under 'tremendous pressure to cooperate' and could shed light on Epstein's dealings.
Bar complaint withdrawal
Threatened that unless Dershowitz withdrew a bar complaint, Boies would find another woman to accuse him.
Perjury charges
Asking if SDNY would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
Perjury Charge
Statement regarding Maxwell: 'We have her dead to rights.'
Maxwell's potential cooperation
Speculation on Maxwell cooperating to reduce sentence and exposing others involved with Epstein.
Legal arguments regarding stay of discovery
Arguments against Maxwell's motion to stay discovery and motion to dismiss; references to Judge Schofield's previous comments.
Annie Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, & Ghis...
Argument opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery pending criminal investigation.
Confidential settlement conference
Confidential telephonic settlement conference between Dershowitz and David Boies. Dershowitz produced a recording of this call, which Plaintiff alleges was unauthorized and violates the Wiretap Act.
Waiver of the Service of Summons
Agreement to waive service of summons and complaint in Case 1:19-cv-10577-LGS.
Waiver of the Service of Summons
Agreement to waive service of summons and acknowledgement of deadline to file an answer.
Witness Tampering
Advising the court about witness tampering in civil cases (7/15/19 Tr. at 71).
Perjury charges against Maxwell
David Boies approached the government in the summer of 2016 asking if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
Re: Possible Statement (Quoted)
Asking if they have given up on a 'mutually acceptable statement from VR or you' and urging to keep trying.
Re: Possible Statement
Proposing specific wording for a settlement statement where the accuser admits the possibility of mistaken identification regarding 'AD'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity