| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Amanda Kramer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Professor Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
identified victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
identified victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
women (unnamed accusers)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David S. Stone
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Opposing counsel negotiating parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. McCAWLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA-1
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stanley Pottinger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ellen Brockman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Eytan Avriel
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Dinner meeting involving The Clintons, Harvey Weinstein, Georgina Chapman, and David Boies | Rao's in Harlem | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Boies, Pottinger, Kessler, and NYT reporters. | BSF Office, Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Private admission by David Boies regarding false accusations. | Private setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged timeframe for the 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner claimed by Dershowitz. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Alan Dershowitz and David Boies where Dershowitz attempted to persuade Boies of h... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Meeting | David Boies approached the government to ask if the Southern District would consider charging Max... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A civil case was proceeding against the Defendant (Mr. Epstein). | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-26 | N/A | Conversation between AUSA and David Boies/Sigrid McCawley regarding press conduct during trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Upcoming arraignment/conference (implied date based on context of 'upcoming') | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-04-21 | N/A | Arraignment Conference | Court (Physical and Phone) | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley representing victims. | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Attorney David Boies filed a Notice of Appearance in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Notice of Appearance filed for David Boies on behalf of victims. | SDNY | View |
| 2020-05-18 | N/A | Plaintiff Annie Farmer files opposing response to Ghislaine Maxwell's request for pre-motion conf... | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-02-12 | N/A | David Boies denies defaming Alan Dershowitz regarding Epstein remarks. | Court Filing | View |
| 2019-11-30 | N/A | Publication of New York Times article regarding David Boies, Pottinger, and Jeffrey Epstein video... | New York Times (Online) | View |
| 2019-11-30 | N/A | New York Times publishes investigative report 'Jeffrey Epstein, Blackmail, and a Lucrative Hot Li... | New York Times (Publication) | View |
| 2019-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by David Boies | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-01 | N/A | Episode 22 of 'The Weekly' airs featuring interviews with Boies and Pottinger. | FX / Hulu | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Public hearing where Ms. Giuffre and Mr. Boies had a right to be heard under 18 U.S.C. § 3771. | Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | Hearing | A court hearing in the case of United States v. Epstein, where the court commented on an article ... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Hearing in United States v. Epstein | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Public hearing in US v. Epstein | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding for case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, where the listed individuals were present. | Southern District | View |
| 2019-07-15 | Court testimony | David Boies advised the Court about witnesses being contacted by Mr. Epstein or his lawyers and s... | Court | View |
A screenshot from the Daily Mail website showing a photograph of Bill and Hillary Clinton dining with Harvey Weinstein, his wife Georgina Chapman, and lawyer David Boies at Rao's restaurant in Harlem. The image includes a caption identifying the individuals and location, along with various web advertisements and a Bates stamp EFTA00037085.
This document is a Law360 White Collar email newsletter from December 13, 2019. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a $30M bail for a former Braskem executive, a fraud trial involving HP and Autonomy's Mike Lynch, and charges against former NFL players for health plan fraud. The document also lists numerous law firms and companies mentioned in legal proceedings, including 'Epstein Becker Green', though there is no direct context linking this to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal cases in this specific text.
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated February 13, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the Roger Stone sentencing, fraud cases involving Theranos and Air Charter Co., and investigations into university funding. A specific article highlights a defamation dispute between attorneys David Boies and Alan Dershowitz, centering on Boies' remarks regarding Dershowitz's alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a formal legal demand letter dated December 2, 2019, from attorneys Scott A. Srebnick and Jose M. Quinon, representing Michael Avenatti, to the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter requests Brady/Giglio material regarding David Boies and John Stanley Pottinger, citing a New York Times report that they attempted to purchase secret videos filmed by Jeffrey Epstein to extort wealthy men. The defense argues that since Boies Schiller Flexner (BSF) lawyers are witnesses against Avenatti, evidence of their firm chairman's potential criminal conduct is relevant to their credibility and motive to curry favor with the government.
This document is a Notice of Deposition filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 24, 2020. The plaintiff (name redacted) notifies the defendants that the oral deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for April 29, 2020, at the offices of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The document lists the legal counsel representing the plaintiff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, seeking to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. The defense argues that the government made false representations to Judge McMahon to bypass a civil protective order and obtain confidential deposition transcripts, alleging collusion between the civil plaintiff's lawyers (Boies Schiller) and federal prosecutors. The document details the history of the civil defamation case, specific deposition questions regarding sexual acts and Epstein, and the procedural history of the protective order modification.
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 2020, discussing a press inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter, Stephen Rex Brown, provides details of a story alleging that in 2016, SDNY prosecutors (specifically an AUSA named Kramer) met with victims' lawyers but declined to pursue new charges against Jeffrey Epstein or perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The internal SDNY response suggests they have no record of the second meeting mentioned and decide not to push back against the story.
This document is an email dated December 1, 2019, forwarding a New York Times article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein, Blackmail and a Lucrative Hot List'. The article summary mentions a hacker claiming to possess Epstein's sex tapes and lawyers speculating on the payment potential for keeping them secret. The URL suggests the involvement of David Boies and Pottinger.
This legal filing is a Reply Memorandum by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, arguing for the suppression of evidence and dismissal of charges based on government misconduct. The defense asserts that prosecutors misled Chief Judge McMahon about the extent of their prior coordination with civil attorneys (Boies Schiller Flexner) to obtain a grand jury subpoena, thereby circumventing a civil protective order. The document details a specific meeting on February 29, 2016, where civil attorneys 'pitched' the prosecution of Maxwell and provided documents, including flight records (though the specific flight data is not listed in this text), which the prosecution later failed to disclose to the judge.
An email from an Assistant US Attorney to Judge Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email updates the court on victim attendance for an upcoming arraignment, noting that Victim-2 will attend via phone while her attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley will attend in person, whereas Victims 1, 3, and 4 will not attend.
This document is a legal memorandum filed on December 20, 2019, in the case of Plaintiff (Redacted, generally known as Virginia Giuffre) v. Alan Dershowitz. The Plaintiff seeks leave to amend her complaint to add a battery claim under the newly effective New York Child Victims Act and a Wiretap Act claim regarding an unauthorized recording Dershowitz made of a settlement conference with her attorney, David Boies. The filing argues that the amendment should be allowed as there is no undue delay, bad faith, or futility, and notes that Dershowitz's defamatory statements have intensified.
This document is a civil complaint filed on November 14, 2019, by Jane Doe 1000 against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff alleges she was recruited in late 1999 under the guise of modeling opportunities for Victoria's Secret, then subjected to years of sexual abuse, manipulation, and trafficking by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York and Palm Beach. The complaint details Epstein's wealth, his specific properties in NY and NM, his 2008 plea deal, his 2019 arrest and death, and specific instances of abuse involving Maxwell.
This document is an email dated December 1, 2019, sent between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email forwards a New York Times article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein, Blackmail and a Lucrative ‘Hot List’,' which discusses David Boies and potential blackmail videos. The sender apologizes for likely duplicating previous notifications about the article.
This document is an internal DOJ/SDNY email chain from June 18, 2019, circulating a Washington Post opinion article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein’s scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the American justice system.' The article criticizes the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of wealthy predators like Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, and Leslie Moonves, and calls for the unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell's files and new investigations into Epstein's conduct in New York, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. It specifically highlights the role of David Boies in representing victims and criticizes Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for the previous non-prosecution agreement.
Email correspondence from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, et al.). The prosecution confirms they spoke with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, who denied reports that their client (name redacted) intended to give press briefings during the upcoming trial, affirming compliance with court rules regarding extrajudicial statements.
Internal DOJ/SDNY email chain from March 2019 coordinating the transfer and digital upload of evidence files related to the Epstein case. The correspondence discusses a discrepancy in the number of pages received from the D.C. FOIA office (16,000 vs 29,000), the organization of 'Boies docs', and video discs related to a 'black book sting'. An Assistant US Attorney directs an FBI case agent and a contractor to manage the data upload to a shared network drive for review on Relativity.
This document is a civil complaint filed on September 21, 2015, in the Southern District of New York by a redacted Plaintiff (identifiable by context as Virginia Giuffre) against Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaint alleges defamation arising from Maxwell's public statements in January 2015, where she called the Plaintiff a liar regarding allegations of sex trafficking and sexual abuse involving Jeffrey Epstein. The document details the history of the alleged abuse (1999-2002), the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and Maxwell's specific efforts to discredit the Plaintiff's reputation.
A 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, regarding the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (20-2413). The document confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Hearing Date Acknowledgment' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell on October 9, 2020, and lists the attorneys served electronically with the notice.
This document is a supplemental letter from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel to Judge Richard Berman arguing for bail. The letter attempts to rebut government claims regarding flight risk, offering Epstein's brother Mark (net worth >$100M) as a bond co-signer and proposing a forensic accounting of Epstein's finances by Joel Podgor. It also addresses the expired Austrian passport (claiming it was for protection against hijacking), New Mexico sex offender registration (claiming it wasn't required), and payments to associates (claiming they were employees, not paid-off witnesses).
This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.
Judge Richard M. Berman writes to Professor Bruce A. Green regarding Green's recent Law Journal opinion piece which criticized the court's handling of the Epstein dismissal hearing. Judge Berman notes a potential undisclosed conflict of interest, revealing that Green had been retained as an ethics expert in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Dershowitz) to argue for the disqualification of David Boies, the attorney representing the victims whose speaking rights Green criticized in his article.
This document is an email chain from April 21, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence details the attendance plans for victims and their counsel at an upcoming arraignment, specifically noting that Victim-2 will attend by phone while her attorneys, David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, will attend in person. It also confirms that four attorneys will appear on behalf of the Government.
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, discusses the case of Ms. Maxwell, focusing on the aftermath of her July 14 detention hearing. It details comments made by David Boies, counsel for an accuser named Farmer, who heavily criticizes Maxwell's 'blame the victim' defense strategy as a 'dangerous tactic'. Boies recounts Farmer's testimony and another story about a 16-year-old named Annie being fraudulently lured by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to a ranch in New Mexico.
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is page 4 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues that public statements made by FBI Special Agent William Sweeney and attorneys for witnesses (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Bradley Edwards) are prejudicial against Ghislaine Maxwell and violate local court rules. The document quotes these individuals characterizing Maxwell as a villain, speculating on her cooperation, and defining her role as the primary facilitator for Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
We have her dead to rights.
Threatened that unless Dershowitz withdrew a bar complaint, Boies would find another woman to accuse him.
Asking if SDNY would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
Attorney David Boies made public statements speculating that Maxwell would be under 'tremendous pressure to cooperate' and could shed light on Epstein's dealings.
Statement regarding Maxwell: 'We have her dead to rights.'
Speculation on Maxwell cooperating to reduce sentence and exposing others involved with Epstein.
Arguments against Maxwell's motion to stay discovery and motion to dismiss; references to Judge Schofield's previous comments.
Argument opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery pending criminal investigation.
Confidential telephonic settlement conference between Dershowitz and David Boies. Dershowitz produced a recording of this call, which Plaintiff alleges was unauthorized and violates the Wiretap Act.
Agreement to waive service of summons and complaint in Case 1:19-cv-10577-LGS.
Agreement to waive service of summons and acknowledgement of deadline to file an answer.
Advising the court about witness tampering in civil cases (7/15/19 Tr. at 71).
David Boies approached the government in the summer of 2016 asking if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
Asking if they have given up on a 'mutually acceptable statement from VR or you' and urging to keep trying.
Proposing specific wording for a settlement statement where the accuser admits the possibility of mistaken identification regarding 'AD'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity