Trove
Sign In Sign Up

THE COURT

Person
Mentions
4828
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2363
Also known as:
THE COURT, MR. DONALDSON
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00018120.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022, identified as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. An attorney, Ms. Comey, informs the judge that the witness order for the day has been changed due to travel issues, with the new sequence being Parkinson, Dawson, Maguire, Meder, and Flatley. The parties also discuss that witness Shelling's testimony has been stipulated to and that witness Maguire will likely testify after lunch.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018119.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge and counsel. The parties discuss how to present sensitive video evidence, containing nude images of a minor, to the jury while protecting the third party's privacy by using only the jurors' screens. The transcript concludes with counsel confirming the order of the next three witnesses: Parkinson (whose testimony is finished), Mr. Dawson, and Kelly Maguire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018118.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between attorneys and the judge regarding the admissibility of testimony about massages given by Jeffrey Epstein, with the judge ultimately sustaining an objection due to the timeframe. The transcript also details a logistical discussion about submitting a sensitive video under seal that contains images of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018116.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Mr. Everdell) argue over the admissibility and context of photos found on a bookshelf, which include images of 'Jane' and nude females. There is a specific dispute over Jane's age at the time (15 vs 19), after which the discussion shifts to the introduction of evidence (video, photos) through a witness named Mr. Parkinson.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018112.jpg

This document is page 11 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey argues for the admission of a photograph (Exhibit 250) found in the 'lake room' of Epstein's home, which depicts Epstein with a young girl across his lap, appearing to pull down her underwear. The prosecution argues this is probative because it was prominently displayed in the house that Maxwell 'ran' as the 'lady of the house,' while Defense attorney Mr. Everdell objects, calling it prejudicial and an attempt to backdoor evidence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018111.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues against the admissibility or weight of photographs taken during a 2005 walk-through of an Epstein residence, noting that witness Juan Alessi left in 2002 and witness 'Jane' only gave general descriptions of art, not specific identifications of the photos in question. The defense contends there is no testimony placing specific photos on the wall during the time relevant to the case.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018110.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the admissibility of video evidence. An attorney, Ms. Comey, argues that a video showing a photograph in the context of a master bedroom shared by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein should be admitted. The Court overrules an objection, agreeing that the video's context makes it different from the photograph in isolation and that it corroborates other testimony.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018108.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing an argument by Ms. Comey to the Court. Ms. Comey asserts that a 'disturbing photograph' displayed outside Jeffrey Epstein's master bedroom contradicts the defense's claim that the defendant was unaware of Epstein's attraction to underage girls. The defense's argument, as described by Comey, relies on a 'halo effect' from Epstein's association with prominent people, which she argues the photograph directly refutes by serving as evidence of Epstein's lifestyle.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018106.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues for the exclusion of a portion of a video walk-through (Exhibit 296). The basis for the argument is that the video shows a photograph on a wall that the judge has already ruled inadmissible as a separate exhibit (Exhibit 288). The dialogue serves to clarify the distinction between multiple pieces of related evidence for the court record.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018105.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of evidence. An attorney, Ms. Comey, contends that a 40-minute walk-through video (Gov. Exhibit 296) is relevant because it shows a previously excluded photograph (Gov. Exhibit 270) prominently displayed outside a master bedroom shared by the defendant and Mr. Epstein. The defense expresses concern that such evidence would be prejudicial to the jury.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018099.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the end of testimony from a witness, Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies that he never saw Mr. Epstein again after an unspecified incident. Following this, the attorneys and the judge agree to adjourn for the day, with the court scheduled to resume at 9:30 the next morning.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018098.jpg

A court transcript page from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of witness John Alessi. Alessi testifies that following an incident involving a picture, he reached an agreement with Jeffrey Epstein where Epstein would not press criminal charges but would instead treat the incident as a loan. Alessi confirms he repaid Epstein $6,300 via money order and was interviewed by the police at Epstein's request.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018097.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about being contacted by Mr. Epstein, meeting with him, and being confronted by Epstein about stealing money. The confrontation involved Epstein showing Alessi a small picture of his face that appeared inside a house.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018089.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about their duties cleaning Mr. Epstein's massage room and explicitly mentions finding a 'large dildo' during the years 1995 through 1998. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects during the questioning to request specific time frames.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018088.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Mr. Alessi. He is being questioned by an attorney, Ms. Comey, about his experiences cleaning up after Mr. Epstein's massages between 1994 and 2002. Alessi states that he did not clean up towels after every massage, explaining that repeat massage therapists would bring the towels to the laundry room themselves, unlike new ones.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018085.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Comey, the Court, and another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding the admission of evidence. The Court admits exhibit 2A unsealed and exhibits 2C through 2W under seal to protect the identities of witnesses and third parties, a measure to which Mr. Pagliuca has no objection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018084.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, covering the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to the admission of exhibits 2C through 2W, arguing they were not written by Mr. Alessi or his wife and lack authentication. The Court (Judge) asks to see 'the book' containing the exhibits and subsequently overrules the objection.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018081.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring a voir dire examination of witness Mr. Alessi. Prosecutor Ms. Comey attempts to introduce Government Exhibits 2A through 2W, requesting most be filed under seal. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions Mr. Alessi to establish that he left his position at the end of 2002 and therefore would not have taken messages or had personal knowledge of events occurring after that date.

Court transcript (voir dire examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018078.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi by Ms. Comey regarding 'Government Exhibit 2,' which is identified as a booklet containing carbon copies of messages. Alessi identifies his own handwriting and his wife's handwriting on specific pages of the booklet.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018077.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi, likely Juan Alessi. The testimony details the procedure for handling incoming phone calls for Mr. Epstein; specifically, if Epstein was unavailable, Alessi, his wife, or a staff member named Taylor would record the caller's name and number in a message book. Alessi confirms that these message books, both new and old, were stored in a utility closet within his office located off the staff room. The page concludes with prosecutor Ms. Comey introducing Government Exhibit 2.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018076.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The testimony details the protocol for taking phone messages for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically using a message book with carbon copies and placing the messages on his desk or kitchen table. The document also records a brief administrative interruption by the Court regarding the collection of exhibit '52'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018073.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from a case involving 'Alessi - Direct.' It records a legal proceeding where Mr. Pagliuca questions Mr. Alessi, who testifies that he has no personal knowledge regarding whether Exhibit 52 was touched by Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell. The Court makes rulings on objections and reserves on a matter pending additional testimony, with Ms. Comey also participating in the discussion.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018068.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions witness Mr. Alessi regarding 'Exhibit 52' (a book/directory), establishing that Alessi had not seen the object for 19 years since leaving Epstein's employment and could not account for its chain of custody during that time. The Judge also sustains an objection regarding the foundation of the evidence.

Court transcript (voir dire examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument by an attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding the authentication of an exhibit related to 'Maxwell and Epstein'. The Court sustains an objection made by Ms. Comey, instructs the jury to disregard certain testimony, and reserves its final decision on admitting the exhibit until after hearing from a witness referred to as 'employee one'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018066.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, during the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The Court and counsel (Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca) discuss the admissibility of testimony regarding an exhibit, specifically a 'book' (likely an address book) where the witness noted his and his wife's names were missing, leading him to believe it was a later version. The judge sustains a foundation objection and orders the jury to disregard the witness's belief about the book's version.

Court transcript (criminal trial)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$162,555,000.00
16 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$162,555,000.00
16 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $9,500,000.00 Value of real property offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received security company THE COURT $1,000,000.00 Bond co-signed by a security company. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $550,000.00 Cash offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... THE COURT $28,500,000.00 Proposed total bond amount. View
2020-12-14 Received Sureties (Family/... THE COURT $0.00 Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... View
2020-07-13 Received Unidentified co-s... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... View
2020-07-10 Received Defense/Co-signers THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. View
2020-07-10 Received Ms. Maxwell / Ass... THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... View
2020-01-01 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $22,500,000.00 Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... View
2019-07-18 Received MR. EPSTEIN THE COURT $0.00 Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... View
2019-07-11 Received Jeffrey Epstein THE COURT $77,000,000.00 Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... View
2010-07-01 Received Epstein's counsel THE COURT $5,000.00 Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. View
As Sender
409
As Recipient
1009
Total
1418

Flight Risk Argument

From: Government officials
To: THE COURT

Argument that Epstein could earn millions abroad from a computer terminal beyond extradition reach.

Legal filing (dkt. 11)
N/A
Communication Source

Status of deliberations

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Deliberations are moving along, making progress, request to end at 5:00 p.m. and continue tomorrow at 9:00 a.m.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed motion for bail

From: Defendant (Maxwell)
To: THE COURT

Referenced as 'Def. Mot. at 7-9'

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to unseal

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Claimed Maxwell grand jury materials contained significant undisclosed information.

Motion
N/A
Communication Source

Order to provide materials

From: THE COURT
To: the government

Ordered submission of grand jury transcripts and exhibits for in camera review.

Order
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Instructions

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Request regarding instructions for jurors opening binders.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Clarification on how nonsealed exhibits will be shown (on screen).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: MR. ROHRBACH
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether personnel forms constitute hearsay or business records.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Question 25

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 gave a negative response to the question whether he or relatives or close friends have been the victim of a crime.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Proposal

From: Defense counsel
To: THE COURT

Discussion about when a letter regarding a proposal would be submitted.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Fifth Amendment Invocation

From: witness
To: THE COURT

A witness wrote to the Court stating they planned to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights.

Written correspondence
N/A
Communication Source

Welcome and Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: Jury

Judge welcomes jurors, apologizes for delay, has them sworn in, and explains opening statements.

Court speech
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification on Count Four

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Asked if conviction on Count Four was possible if Maxwell assisted with Jane's return trip but not the flight to NM, and regarding intent for sexual activity in NM.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Question

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Question regarding evidence/procedure; Judge answers 'Yes, you may consider it.'

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Dismissal and Timing

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Regarding dismissal at 5 p.m. and timing for the next day.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Mask Mandate

From: chief judge
To: THE COURT

Reminder to wear masks at all times due to the variant.

Reminder
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Br. at 53

From: the defendant
To: THE COURT

Argument that disclosure will color Juror 50's testimony.

Brief
N/A
Communication Source

Gov. Br. at 42

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Argument that there is no legitimate interest in limiting access.

Brief
N/A
Communication Source

Immunity and Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

The Court explains the immunity order, the requirement to testify truthfully, and instructs the juror not to discuss jury deliberations.

Court examination
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Objections

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the scheduling of arguments concerning offense level calculations and financial penalties.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Submission of letter

From: Ms. Trzaskoma
To: THE COURT

Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it appropriate, we can submit a letter

Statement
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Defense Team (implied)
To: THE COURT

A letter submitted to the court that Ms. Brune says they 'worked very hard to submit... that was accurate.'

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Transportation/Instructions

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

A note from the jury regarding transportation, aiding and abetting, and intent regarding sexual activity.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Details regarding any material changes to confinement conditions, specifically access to legal materials and defense counsel.

Order for written status updates
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibit 52 issue

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Briefing received by the court at 9:45.

Briefing
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search