National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Employers
|
Regulatory |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
AFL-CIO, SEIU, FMI, COLLE, California Chamber of Commerce, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
Regulatory process participant |
7
|
1 | |
|
location
Supreme Court
|
Regulatory judicial |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Assisted Living Federation of America (ALFA)
|
Adversarial in rulemaking context |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Baker & McKenzie
|
Regulator commenter |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
Adversarial in rulemaking context |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Brian E. Hayes
|
Dissenting member |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
ALFA
|
Commenter agency |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Baker & McKenzie
|
Commenter agency |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Immigration Law Center
|
Commenter agency |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Member Hayes
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Various Organizations (AHCA, ALFA, etc.)
|
Adversarial public commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Americans for Limited Government (ALG)
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Delegation of authority |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW)
|
Aligned |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Employers
|
Regulator regulated |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Buffalo Wild Wings, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, etc.
|
Commenter on proposed rule |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Department of Labor
|
Policy adoption |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Various Organizations (e.g., U.S. Chamber of Commerce, AFL-CIO)
|
Regulatory rulemaking process |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Various Organizations (e.g., California Chamber, AFL-CIO)
|
Regulatory adversarial supportive |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Aligned |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Public
|
Regulatory process |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Various organizations (COLLE, ALFA, Unions, Employer Groups)
|
Regulatory body and commenter |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Steelworkers
|
Submitted comment |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to mandate that employers post notices of employee rights under the... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proposed a new rule requiring employers to post a notic... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board published its final rule and response to public comments regar... | Federal Register, United St... | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule in the Federal Register regard... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of rules and regulations in the Federal Register, where the NLRB defends its rulemaki... | N/A | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule in the Federal Register regard... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule and reasoning in the Federal R... | N/A (Publication) | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of the National Labor Relations Board's Final Rule in the Federal Register, requiring... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The NLRB published its final rule in the Federal Register regarding a notice of employee rights u... | N/A | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The NLRB reviewed public comments on its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the emplo... | N/A | View |
Proposed Rule on Unlawful Union Activity
Argued that the notice fails to fully inform employees of their rights as union members.
Proposed Rule on Unlawful Union Activity
Urged the inclusion of a variety of other examples of unlawful union conduct in the notice.
Proposed Rule on Collective-Bargaining Provision
Requested clarification that an employer's obligation is to bargain in good faith, not necessarily to reach an agreement.
Proposed Rule on Coverage Provision
Suggested adding language to clarify that NLRA protections apply to all employees, irrespective of immigration status.
Proposed Rule on Unlawful Union Activity
Suggested three changes to the language describing unlawful union activity, such as modifying the wording on threats and discrimination.
Proposed Rule on Unlawful Union Activity
Argued that the notice fails to fully inform employees of their rights as union members.
Proposed Rule on Unlawful Union Activity
Urged the inclusion of a variety of other examples of unlawful union conduct in the notice.
Proposed Rule on Collective-Bargaining Provision
Requested clarification that an employer's obligation is to bargain in good faith, not necessarily to reach an agreement.
Proposed Rule on Coverage Provision
Suggested adding language to clarify that NLRA protections apply to all employees, irrespective of immigration status.
Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) rega...
Comments argued that proposed remedies were punitive, inappropriate, and a 'trap for the employers'. The Board addresses these comments in the text.
Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) rega...
Comments argued that proposed remedies were punitive, inappropriate, and a 'trap for the employers'. The Board addresses these comments in the text.
Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) rega...
Comments argued that proposed remedies were punitive, inappropriate, and a 'trap for the employers'. The Board addresses these comments in the text.
NLRB Rulemaking Authority
Argued that Section 6 of the NLRA was intended for procedural rulemaking, not substantive legislative rules.
NLRB Proposed Rule
Supported the proposed rule, stating it and a similar election notice rule are minimally burdensome.
NLRB Role
Argued that Congress did not intend to empower the NLRB as a rulemaking body, but rather as an investigatory/enforcement agent.
NLRB Rulemaking Authority
Submitted a joint comment arguing against the Board's assertion of Section 6 authority, quoting precedent about agencies not making major policy decisions.
NLRB Rulemaking Authority
Argued that Section 6 of the NLRA was intended for procedural rulemaking, not substantive legislative rules.
NLRB Proposed Rule
Supported the proposed rule, stating it and a similar election notice rule are minimally burdensome.
NLRB Role
Argued that Congress did not intend to empower the NLRB as a rulemaking body, but rather as an investigatory/enforcement agent.
Comments on a proposed rule requiring employers to post n...
A total of 7,034 comments were received regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The majority of comments opposed the rule, while many others supported it. Comments were submitted electronically and in hard copy via regulations.gov.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity