MR. PAGLIUCA
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Opposing counsel |
15
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
37 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 | |
|
person
Dr. Dubin
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
136 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding Exhibit 3505-005 | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell where she is questioned about computer files and a contact list. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding lists of names associated with Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding media reports of Epstein's flight logs | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of Mrs. Hesse | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Shawn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Nicole Hesse | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Mr. Pagliuca | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of Exhibit 52 (a book) to the jury. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding sexualized massages and relationship timeline. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of evidentiary exhibits (1J, 1K, 1M) during trial testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of Juan Patricio Alessi | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Afternoon Court Session during Jury Deliberations | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the 'business record exception' and admissibility of phone logs/notes. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony from four witnesses (Carolyn, Jane, Kate, Mr. Alessi) regarding... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness is being questioned about Jeffrey Epstein's use of masseuses. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018792.jpg
This document is page 194 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, focusing on verifying her signature on page 19 of Exhibit C8. The defense moves to admit Exhibits C8 and C9, to which prosecutor Ms. Comey objects, and the Court defers the ruling until a break.
DOJ-OGR-00018791.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to refresh the witness's memory regarding prior statements made under oath in 2009 and her answers to interrogatories, but the witness expresses confusion. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, and the court sustains her objections.
DOJ-OGR-00018790.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions her about her memory of answering written interrogatories for a lawsuit, which she claims not to recall. The attorneys and the judge then discuss showing Carolyn a portion of her deposition transcript to potentially refresh her recollection.
DOJ-OGR-00018787.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint Carolyn previously filed against Mr. Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Carolyn states she does not recall certain details of the complaint and denies having reviewed or approved it before her lawyers filed it in federal court.
DOJ-OGR-00018786.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examining a witness named Carolyn. The questioning centers on a paragraph from a 2009 federal complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, which alleges Epstein paid Carolyn $300 after an encounter. The transcript captures a legal objection by another attorney, Ms. Comey, which the judge sustains.
DOJ-OGR-00018785.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony, read from a legal filing, describes an incident where Carolyn was paid $300 by Epstein to observe a sexual act performed by her friend on him. It also mentions a subsequent telephone call where Epstein requested Carolyn return to his residence to give him a massage.
DOJ-OGR-00018783.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint (Exhibit C5) where Carolyn made a claim against a Mr. Epstein; Carolyn now states that the complaint, which she previously testified under oath was accurate, was in fact not accurate. Mr. Pagliuca also establishes that a specific paragraph of the complaint does not contain the name "Maxwell."
DOJ-OGR-00018782.jpg
This document is page 184 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is cross-examining a witness named Carolyn regarding a complaint filed on her behalf by attorney Mr. Willits in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully objects to the admission of defense exhibit C4 on the grounds that it is 'not inconsistent,' leading the defense to request a sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00018781.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, where they are trying to locate Exhibit C4. The witness states the exhibit is related to her arrest, and another attorney, Ms. Comey, requests to approach the bench.
DOJ-OGR-00018780.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a previous legal complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf by an attorney named Mr. Willits in state court; specifically, Pagliuca establishes that this 91-page, 209-paragraph complaint did not contain a single mention of Ms. Maxwell's name.
DOJ-OGR-00018779.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning references Carolyn's prior deposition testimony, where she affirmed her trust in her attorneys regarding a complaint she filed. The transcript concludes with Carolyn confirming that the complaint she filed in federal court was not against a Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018778.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning, led by Mr. Pagliuca, focuses on the timeline of the witness's interactions with the FBI in 2007 and her subsequent filing of two civil complaints in 2008 with the assistance of her lawyer, Richard Willits. The document ends with the attorney directing the witness to a specific prior deposition for review.
DOJ-OGR-00018777.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning covers Carolyn's past, including a 2008 lawsuit she filed against Epstein and Sarah Kellen, her move from Florida to Georgia in 2003, and her legal representation by Jack Scarola for a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00018776.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies between the witness's current memory and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding who called her about 'Incubus tickets' (Sarah or Epstein). The questioning also establishes that Sarah called the witness to convey that Epstein wanted to take photographs of her.
DOJ-OGR-00018773.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca questions Carolyn about a statement she made to the FBI in 2007 concerning an incident in a kitchen with a chef, which she confirms. He then asks about a separate visit where a person named Sarah allegedly led her upstairs, which Carolyn denies.
DOJ-OGR-00018772.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning attempts to refresh Carolyn's memory about a prior statement she allegedly made to the FBI in 2007 concerning a chef. Carolyn disputes the attorney's characterization of the statement, claiming the document she was shown mentioned her taking off her panties for $400 but did not mention a chef.
DOJ-OGR-00018770.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony covers Carolyn's 2007 statements to the FBI, confirming she received $300 from Epstein and left his house with Ms. Roberts. The questioning focuses on discrepancies regarding how she obtained Epstein's phone number and the specifics of a phone call she made to 'Sarah' to schedule a massage, noting that someone from Epstein's house (not Epstein himself) returned the call.
DOJ-OGR-00018769.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a $300 payment allegedly made by Epstein to Carolyn after a massage. Carolyn provides conflicting answers, first agreeing the money was from Epstein and then stating she didn't know who it was from, before being confronted with a document stating Epstein paid her.
DOJ-OGR-00018768.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony details a past encounter involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Virginia Roberts (noted as being 18 at the time). The witness confirms statements made to the FBI in 2007 regarding Epstein ordering her to undress and Virginia Roberts having sex with Epstein in her presence.
DOJ-OGR-00018767.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony covers a 2007 statement Carolyn gave to the FBI regarding an unidentified older woman, and details a specific incident at Epstein's house where Ms. Roberts (Virginia Roberts Giuffre) led Carolyn upstairs and instructed her to massage Epstein's legs while Roberts massaged his back.
DOJ-OGR-00018762.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the resumption of proceedings after a lunch break, where the jury returns and the witness, 'Carolyn,' takes the stand to continue cross-examination by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The judge reminds the witness she is under oath and instructs the attorney to adjust his microphone.
DOJ-OGR-00018761.jpg
This court transcript page from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion about a witness named Carolyn. An attorney expresses concern that the jury may wrongly connect Carolyn's schizophrenia to actions by Epstein, while her children's situation is due to her long-standing problems. In response, attorney Ms. Comey requests that sensitive details about Carolyn's family be discussed under seal, a motion the judge grants, moving the proceedings to the robing room.
DOJ-OGR-00018760.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the judge that he should be permitted to cross-examine a witness named Carolyn about her extensive psychiatric history and ongoing drug abuse, claiming she minimized these issues during direct examination. He specifically mentions her history of schizophrenia and having her children removed from her custody.
DOJ-OGR-00018759.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between the judge and attorneys Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Menninger regarding trial procedure. The key topics are the timing of an objection to a potential witness's testimony and the estimated length of the cross-examination for the current witness, Carolyn, with the judge emphasizing the need for efficiency to not waste the jury's time.
DOJ-OGR-00018747.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning establishes that approximately 19 years prior, Carolyn visited a specific house for the first time, accompanied by Virginia Roberts, who led her inside and upstairs. The proceedings are then paused for a lunch break by the judge, who addresses an individual named Mr. Pagliuca.
Scheduling and Privilege Waiver
Discussion regarding when to address the waiver theory concerning 'Jane', scheduling for Friday vs Monday, and the timeline for the government to rest its case.
Expert Witness Testimony
Pagliuca argues it is unlikely experts LaPorte and Naso will testify.
New Witness Disclosure
Discussion of newly disclosed witness William Brown.
Defense strategy and calling attorneys as witnesses
Pagliuca argues it is inappropriate to discuss defense strategy; Court rules he cannot call an attorney as a witness without briefing.
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding signature on Exhibit C8.
Admissibility of Interrogatory Questions
Discussion regarding the admission of questions 16 and 17 from a prior document concerning Carolyn's visits to Epstein's home and payments received.
Scope of Cross-Examination
Argument regarding the admissibility of questions about memory, confabulation, and alcohol effects during cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.
Witness Testimony vs Stipulation
Discussion regarding whether to use a live witness or a stipulation for a 302 report.
Adherence to household manual
Questioning regarding whether Alessi followed a specific manual and knowledge of 'the countess'.
Cross-examination regarding substance abuse
Attorney questions witness about drug use in 2002-2003 and at age 13.
Witness Preclusion
Clarifying that Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards are precluded so they can be released.
Admissibility of Evidence (Exhibit 52)
Discussion regarding whether Exhibit 52 will be admitted in redacted form and if the defense will stipulate that sub-exhibits are true copies.
Witness Anonymity and Courtroom Logistics
Discussion regarding how to handle document display screens to prevent public disclosure of anonymous witness identities while maintaining efficiency.
Witness Binder / Cross-Examination
Discussion regarding the contents of a binder for the witness (containing Daubert hearing testimony and 3500 material) prior to the jury entering.
Relevance of Dr. Rocchio's testimony
Discussion regarding 'grooming the environment,' perpetrator deception, and hindsight bias effect.
Admissibility and Procedural Status
Discussion regarding not admitting a specific item and determining where questioning left off (around '33') to be handled at sidebar.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding observations of inappropriate conduct between Epstein and teenage females.
Direct Examination / Exhibit Admission
Mr. Pagliuca resumes direct examination of Dr. Dubin and offers Exhibit 662-RR into evidence.
Discrepancies in Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Carolyn, about the start date of alleged abuse (May 1, 2001) and additional claims of specific sexual acts in her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which she denies making.
Scope of cross-examination regarding a study on grooming ...
Mr. Pagliuca previews his intent to cross-examine a witness about a study (disclosure 3502-018) which concluded that five factors cannot be used to prospectively predict grooming behavior. The Court grants permission, noting it is consistent with the witness's testimony.
Acknowledgment of ruling
Mr. Pagliuca thanks the judge after the ruling is made.
Compensation fund payment and prior claims
Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines the witness, Carolyn, about a $2,804,000 compensation payment she received, a $446,000 deduction related to prior claims against Mr. Epstein and Ms. Kellen, and the consequences of submitting false information to the fund.
Working conditions at Mr. Epstein's residence
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Alessi, about the differences in his duties and living arrangements depending on whether Mr. Epstein was present at the residence. The testimony covers access to the house, working hours, and the presence of other staff.
Objection during cross-examination
Mr. Pagliuca objects to questioning Dr. Loftus about a single study, arguing it's prejudicial and similar to a previous objection the Court sustained when he tried to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio. The Court questions his intent, and he clarifies he was trying to impeach the witness.
Prior deposition testimony regarding Jane, Jeffrey Epstei...
Mr. Pagliuca questions Mr. Alessi about his previous deposition answer regarding the year Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell. Alessi clarifies his answer, stating he confused two different girls he met.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity