Mr. Gair
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. OKULA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Conrad
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Conrad
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Catherine Conrad
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul Daugerdas
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Conrad
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Conrad
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Conrad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Donohue
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. DAVIS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Conrad
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. OKULA
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant informati... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Direct examination of a witness named Brune. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The underlying trial in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of a witness regarding juror Catherine M. Conrad's background check. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Brune regarding the decision not to investigate Juror No. 1, Ms. Con... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial in which Conrad served as a juror and David Parse was a defendant. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A hearing in the case of United States of America v. Paul Daugerdas where the defense and prosecu... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant information' conc... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Court hearing | A court hearing to discuss an application to close the courtroom for the testimony of Ms. Conrad,... | courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Flight | Planned testimony of Ms. Conrad where she intends to assert her Fifth Amendment right against sel... | courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Ms. Conrad. | Federal Court, Southern Dis... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness/juror Conrad. | N/A | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Ms. Conrad in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Dauge... | Federal courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Conrad by Mr. Gair regarding a prior court event. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Court hearing | A court hearing in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., involving the testimony of a wi... | Courtroom of the Southern D... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Adjournment | The court hearing was adjourned until 9:45 a.m. the following day, February 16, 2012. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court proceeding involving the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. ... | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court proceedings in United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court testimony of Ms. Conrad regarding her juror service. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court hearing involving witness Conrad. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court hearing regarding juror misconduct (Conrad). Witness excuses, arrest warrant discussed but ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court hearing where Catherine Conrad is granted immunity and examined regarding juror misconduct. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court proceedings in USA v. Daugerdas; direct examination of Catherine Conrad. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court testimony of witness Conrad in US v. Daugerdas. | Courtroom | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court hearing/Examination of Ms. Conrad | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
This document is a condensed transcript (pages 221-224) from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of Ms. Conrad, a suspended New York attorney who served as a juror in a complex tax shelter fraud case presided over by Judge Pauley. The questioning revolves around her motives for serving on the jury while suspended, specifically whether she used the service to demonstrate stability for her bar reinstatement petition, which she denies.
DOJ-OGR-00009946.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, containing the cross-examination of a juror named Conrad regarding her service in the trial of U.S. v. Daugerdas, et al. The questioning attorney probes Conrad's impartiality by referencing her past criminal record, her status as a suspended attorney, and a letter she wrote after the verdict. Conrad affirms that while she initially believed defendant David Parse was guilty, her final decision was based solely on Judge Pauley's legal instructions and was free from any bias.
DOJ-OGR-00009944.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on her credibility, exploring her past actions as a juror for a Mr. Okula, her understanding of financial matters from an expert named Dr. DeRosa, and her failure to disclose a prior disciplinary suspension from the Bar Association during jury selection. The transcript also reveals personal details, such as her husband being a convicted felon, which are used to challenge her character and motivations.
DOJ-OGR-00009943.jpg
This document is a transcript excerpt from the trial 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of a witness named Conrad, who is questioned about a letter she wrote to Mr. Okula, her use of specific stamps, and her negative opinions of individuals named Brubaker and Parse (referring to them as 'idiot', 'stupid', and 'fricken crooks'). The witness also admits to having been suspended in the Southern District of New York. This document appears to have been filed as an exhibit in a later 2022 case (1:20-cv-00813), likely the US Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase litigation regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009942.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, who was a juror in a previous trial. The questioning focuses on a letter Conrad wrote to another individual, Mr. Okula, in which she claimed she held out for two days to convict a defendant, David Parse. This is contrasted with a later statement she made to Judge Pauley, where she stated that Parse should not have been convicted on a particular charge, highlighting a significant contradiction in her accounts of the jury deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a juror named Conrad. The questioning reveals that Conrad was aware of her husband's extensive criminal history but deliberately concealed it during jury selection (voir dire) to secure a place on the jury. The transcript explores her motivations and her understanding of her civic duty in light of her actions.
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It features the direct examination of a witness, Catherine Conrad, by attorney Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on impeaching Conrad's credibility by highlighting her history of alcoholism, pancreatitis, and a suspension from the practice of law by the Appellate Division for 'shocking disregard for the judicial system' and mental/physical disability. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, often associated with document releases related to high-profile inquiries, though the specific link to Epstein in this fragment appears to be the document batch source rather than direct content.
DOJ-OGR-00009926.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad. The questioning focuses on her financial situation, including her assets of approximately $14,000, her past earnings as a lawyer, and her tax filing history. The attorney attempts to scrutinize her financial success and challenges the truthfulness of a prior affidavit she submitted to a disciplinary committee, while Ms. Conrad is often evasive in her answers.
DOJ-OGR-00009924.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It was filed as an exhibit (Doc 646-10) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the examination of a witness named Ms. Conrad by Mr. Gair regarding her conduct in a previous hearing before Judge Pauley, specifically concerning her financial inability to retain counsel and her remark that a financial affidavit form was 'garbage'.
DOJ-OGR-00009919.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a witness, likely Ms. Conrad, in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. The questioning focuses on her understanding of a court order and subpoena issued by Judge Pauley, her legal training, and her prior statements to court staff that she would not appear or testify. The witness also mentions having met Ms. Sternheim six times and having 'Googled' the questioner after a previous trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009918.jpg
This document contains transcript pages 101-104 from the case United States v. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. The witness, Catherine M. Conrad, a former juror in the case, initially asserts her Fifth Amendment privilege regarding her previous voir dire testimony but is subsequently granted immunity by the Court. Under questioning by attorney Mr. Gair, Conrad admits to lies and omissions during her jury service selection in 2011 and confirms she called Judge Pauley's chambers earlier that morning to state she would not attend court.
DOJ-OGR-00009917.jpg
This document is a court transcript from *United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas* dated February 15, 2012. It details a hearing regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, who intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Her attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues for the courtroom to be closed to protect Conrad's privacy regarding alcohol dependence and disciplinary records, but the Court denies this request, citing that the information is already public.
DOJ-OGR-00009398.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony given by a witness named Edelstein. He recounts receiving a 'surprising and shocking' letter from a juror, which he found disturbing due to its odd tone. Edelstein discusses his process of connecting the contents of this letter with information previously provided by Theresa Trzaskoma on May 12, and his subsequent conversation about the letter with his partner, Randy Kim.
DOJ-OGR-00009374.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring a redirect examination by an attorney named Brune. The questioning focuses on a Westlaw report concerning a person named Catherine M. Conrad, verifying her name, birth year (1969), and age (41) against a jury list provided before voir dire. Attorneys Gair and Shechtman raise objections during the questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00009372.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on February 24, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, who is questioned about their firm's decision not to investigate potential juror misconduct by Juror No. 1, Ms. Conrad, following a verdict on May 24th. Brune states that the firm did not believe there was an issue to investigate at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00009365.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is testifying about a July 22nd phone call with the Judge regarding the identification of jury consultants, specifically mentioning Mr. Donohue, Julie Blackman, and Mr. Schoeman. The testimony clarifies that Mr. Nardello performed investigative work but was not a jury consultant.
DOJ-OGR-00009326.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Brune, who is being questioned about her assessment of potentially significant information regarding a juror and whether it should have been raised with a Judge Pauley. The transcript includes legal objections and rulings, indicating a contentious line of questioning.
Cross examination regarding financial affidavit
Testimony regarding whether the witness called a financial affidavit 'garbage' and her ability to afford counsel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity