your Honor
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. COHEN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker (implied lawyer)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. DONALESKI
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. FIGGINS
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
unnamed attorney
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified speaker (attorney)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Anonymous Juror
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unidentified speaker
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joe Ficalora and Thomas Cangemi
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chauntae Davies
|
Witness judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed speaker
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Sidebar discussion | Attorneys Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Comey discuss with the judge whether Amanda can be... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Mr. Visoski provides testimony during a direct examination by Ms. Comey, describing the layout of... | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-07-09 | Legal filing | The filing of a request to vacate a court order concerning laptop access. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Bail hearing | An attorney, MR. COHEN, makes a concluding argument to a judge to grant bail for his client. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A speaker (likely a prosecutor) addresses the court regarding the defendant's flight risk, surren... | courtroom | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court conference | A court proceeding where Ms. Moe, on behalf of the government, discusses the status of discovery ... | court | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where the prosecution argues against bail for the defendant, citing flight ris... | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal proceeding | A court hearing where the government is arguing that the defendant is a flight risk and should no... | United States | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A legal argument is made by the government against granting bail to a defendant. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-01-15 | Court order | An order was issued which is now being requested to be vacated. | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-15 | Court order | A court order was issued, which this document requests to be vacated. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Bail hearing | An attorney, Mr. Cohen, makes a concluding argument to the court to grant bail for his client. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court hearing | A speaker, likely a prosecutor, is addressing a judge about the defendant's financial disclosures. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where the prosecution argues against the defendant's release, citing flight ri... | Courtroom | View |
| 2020-12-10 | N/A | Court proceeding/hearing where Mr. Cohen is speaking. | Court | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court proceeding | A speaker, likely a defense attorney, is arguing for their client's release on conditions, citing... | Court | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Remote court appearance for Ms. Maxwell before 'Your Honor'. | Remote / Southern District ... | View |
| 2020-02-10 | Court hearing | A defense attorney presents an argument to a judge requesting an adjournment to allow more time f... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-12-19 | Court hearing | A discussion during a court proceeding regarding the defense's request for a timeline on an inspe... | Court | View |
| 2019-12-19 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding a defendant's right to possess a firearm during the pretrial phase of c... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court proceeding | A speaker, representing the government, addresses the court regarding the dismissal of an indictm... | court | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing for case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, where a speaker (likely prosecution) is making argume... | Court | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court proceeding | A speaker, likely a prosecutor, is making an argument to a judge, countering points made by the d... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB where arguments were made about Mr. Epstein's fl... | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018643.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Meder by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning establishes that Meder lacks personal knowledge regarding the accuracy of dates, potential alterations, or the origin of photos found on CDs. The questioning specifically raises the possibility that the photos may have been sent to someone named Epstein before being saved to a CD.
DOJ-OGR-00018640.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness, Meder, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning establishes that the witness reviewed hundreds of CDs containing thousands of photographs that were seized during two searches in July 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00018634.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Meder. The witness identifies Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph, referred to as Government Exhibit 313, which originated from a CD reviewed during the investigation into both individuals. The government attorney, Ms. Comey, then requests that the exhibit be placed under seal to protect a party's privacy, to which there are no objections.
DOJ-OGR-00018632.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the direct examination of a witness named Meder, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness identifies Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph sourced from a CD (logged as 1B75) related to the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation'. The court, presided over by a judge, admits the photograph as Government's Exhibit 314 after it is offered into evidence by Ms. Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00018630.jpg
This court transcript page, dated August 10, 2022, documents the direct examination of a witness, Meder, by attorney Ms. Comey. The witness identifies a photograph, Government Exhibit 347, as originating from a CD in the Epstein and Maxwell investigation and identifies both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in the image. The court subsequently admits the photograph into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018611.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, where an attorney addresses the judge. The attorney discusses the permissible scope of testimony for a witness, Mr. Flatley, expressing concern that a November 26 disclosure suggests expert opinion on metadata verification, while indicating acceptance if the testimony is confined to factual information from an earlier September disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00018610.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. The judge, Ms. Moe, and Ms. Menninger discuss the timeline for investigating a potential violation of a sequestration order, deciding not to expedite the matter due to a person named Brian's travel plans. Ms. Menninger also raises a new issue, highlighting a discrepancy between a recent letter from the government and information she received in a prior conferral.
DOJ-OGR-00018601.jpg
This legal document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing an argument about witness tampering. An attorney informs the judge that a witness who already testified contacted a future witness, Brian, to discuss their testimony, potentially violating a sequestration order. The attorney requests that Brian be barred from testifying, while another attorney, Ms. Moe, begins a counterargument by citing legal rules regarding witness exclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00018589.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures legal arguments regarding a piece of evidence in a conspiracy trial. The prosecution asserts that a topless photograph of a victim, along with flight logs showing she traveled with Maxwell and Epstein at age 17, proves she was a minor victim of the conspiracy. The defense, represented by Ms. Menninger, counters that photo metadata and testimony from Mr. Alessi establish the victim was not a minor at the relevant times, arguing the prosecution's claim is contrary to its own evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018585.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument by Ms. Menninger. She contends that certain photographs should be inadmissible as evidence because they are undated, lack a witness for authentication, and there is no proof they haven't been altered, thus failing to meet the legal standard for admissibility.
DOJ-OGR-00018576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an FBI Staff Operations Specialist named Meder by Ms. Comey. Meder testifies to having 10 years of experience at the FBI, currently working on the child exploitation and human trafficking squad, and begins to explain how FBI case files and evidence are organized.
DOJ-OGR-00018563.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness, Maguire, who testifies that the FBI discovered boxes containing hard drives inside a residence. The witness confirms that these boxes were already sealed with evidence tape when found and that the FBI did not apply the tape.
DOJ-OGR-00018562.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Maguire by counsel Ms. Moe. The witness describes a photograph, Government Exhibit 935, which shows a cabinet in a residence containing boxes of hard drives with evidence tape. A redacted version of the photograph, 935R, is subsequently admitted into evidence by the court without objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00018557.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire by an attorney, Ms. Moe. The testimony serves to authenticate Government Exhibit 929, a photograph of a dressing room and a safe found during a search of a residence. After Maguire confirms the photograph's accuracy and describes its contents, the exhibit is admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00018556.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of Special Agent Maguire. The government attorney, Ms. Moe, questions Maguire about Government Exhibit 926, a photograph of CDs seized by the FBI from a closet on a fifth floor. Maguire confirms the CDs were marked as evidence Item 1B-63, and the court admits the exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018547.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing a government attorney, Ms. Moe, conducting a direct examination of a witness named Maguire. The witness identifies Government Exhibits 903-R and 904-R as photographs of a massage room, describing a massage table and other items visible. The attorney then offers one of the exhibits into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018545.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire. The testimony concerns a search of a residence where a massage room was discovered on the third floor. The government's attorney, Ms. Moe, questions the agent about the room and successfully introduces a photograph of its entryway as Government Exhibit 902-R.
DOJ-OGR-00018532.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of a schoolgirl outfit as evidence. The prosecution argues the outfit corroborates a witness's testimony about Epstein's 'practice' of asking people to wear such costumes. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, contends the evidence is highly prejudicial, based on a single witness, and insufficient to establish a pattern, a position with which the judge seems to agree.
DOJ-OGR-00018503.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. McHugh, about the typical assets of high-net-worth individuals, such as multiple bank accounts, brokerage accounts, homes, and planes. An attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to a question about planes, and the court sustains the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00018502.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named McHugh. The questioning focuses on financial transactions from October 19, 1999, specifically a sale and a transfer of approximately $18.3 million each, within an account controlled by Jeffrey Epstein. The line of questioning aims to establish that Epstein possessed significant wealth.
DOJ-OGR-00018479.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. McHugh, by an attorney, Ms. Moe. Mr. McHugh testifies that he has worked at the bank JPMorgan for thirty years, currently holds the title of Executive Director, and works within the client service group.
DOJ-OGR-00018477.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of a cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her U visa status. During the proceeding, attorney Ms. Sternheim moves to admit Exhibits K-8 and K-10, which the court accepts under seal to protect the witness's identity.
DOJ-OGR-00018476.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on whether she has discussed her alleged abuse by Epstein with other victims and probes her memory of a meeting with the government concerning her U visa application, which her lawyer, Mr. Edwards, attended. The witness states she has not discussed her experiences with others and does not recall specific details about the meeting or her lawyer's actions during it.
DOJ-OGR-00018458.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange where an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, requests a lunch break during the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The Court grants the request, announcing to the jury a break for 45 minutes to an hour starting at 12:45.
DOJ-OGR-00018406.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kate. The witness testifies that she does not plan to sue Maxwell, is not expecting more money from Epstein and Maxwell, and has no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial. After the questioning concludes, the court announces a morning break.
Witness Logistics
Discussing arrangements for Jane to travel home and potential recall needs.
Scope of witness testimony and disclosures
An attorney addresses the judge to clarify the acceptable scope of testimony for a witness, Mr. Flatley. The attorney objects to potential expert opinion testimony regarding metadata verification mentioned in a November 26 disclosure but is agreeable if the testimony is limited to factual matters from an earlier September disclosure.
Ambiguity of evidence regarding flights
MS. MOE responds to the previous speaker, stating that a note being discussed is unclear about which flight it refers to (a return flight vs. a flight to New Mexico), making it difficult to determine intent.
Acknowledgment of ruling
Mr. Pagliuca thanks the judge after the ruling is made.
Admissibility of photographic evidence
Ms. Menninger argues that photographs require a witness for authentication to be admissible, especially if they are undated, to establish context and verify they haven't been altered.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity