MR. SCAROLA
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Professor Cassell
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Simpson
|
Opposing counsel |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Professional collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS (Deponent)
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mike Danchuck
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Informational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Scott
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew, the Duke of York
|
Correspondents |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Co witnesses |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Simpson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Examiner and deponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS (Deponent)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition/testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness by Mr. Scarola. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unidentified witness regarding a lawsuit referred to as 'Epstein versus RRA'. Th... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Scarola, with Mr. Pike present as coun... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Testimony of Professor Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition Interruption | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Professor Cassell regarding knowledge of allegations against Alan Dershowitz. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Disruption during deposition | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Mr. Rothstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | End of deposition session / Break | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Disclosure | Mr. Scarola made statements to the government about Carolyn. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Professor Cassell | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Mr. Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Hearing interruption where phone participants are identified. | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Marking of Cassell Exhibit 3 | Deposition setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recess in deposition proceedings | Deposition room (unspecifie... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal proceeding involving testimony where Alan Dershowitz is present and accused of disrupting t... | Unspecified legal venue | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Deposition/Hearing | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness regarding an investigation. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Hearing Testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition or hearing where a witness is questioned about evidence concerning Professor Der... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A request was made for a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Video Record Recess | Deposition Room (Time: 4:01... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness | Not specified on this page | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The witness, Carolyn, was shown answers to interrogatories and was directed by Mr. Scarola. | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017507.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 66-69) of a deposition of Scott Rothstein. He is questioned by Ms. Haddad regarding the electronic filing of federal court cases via PACER in 2009, specifically concerning a complaint filed by attorney Brad Edwards around July 24th. Rothstein admits that while he lacks specific recollection of the filing or a July 23rd meeting, the case may have been utilized to further his Ponzi scheme. The document ends with a question regarding whether Cara Holmes was an FBI or IRS agent.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017505.jpg
In this deposition transcript, a witness named Scott (likely Scott Rothstein) admits to Ms. Haddad that he operated a Ponzi scheme involving the sale of fake legal settlements. He testifies that while 90% of the settlements were completely fictitious, he utilized an actual ongoing case involving Jeffrey Epstein to 'bolster the visual' for sophisticated investors to convince them the settlements were real. He describes creating fake documents and introducing investors to lawyers working on the real Epstein file to add legitimacy to his fraud.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017503.jpg
This document contains pages 50-53 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (implied by RRA and Ponzi scheme references). The witness is questioned by Ms. Haddad about his interactions with investors (Discala/Clockwork Group) in 2009 and his use of the Epstein case files to legitimize a Ponzi scheme. The witness admits to stealing money from investors and mentions specific lawyers involved in the Epstein case at the RRA firm, including Brad Edwards and Russ Adler, and notes looking at a flight manifest at Adler's direction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017501.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (Pages 42-45) of an individual admitting to running a Ponzi scheme. The witness discusses using the legitimacy of the 'Epstein case' to sell fictitious settlements to investors. The witness recalls being told by associate Russ Adler that Jeffrey Epstein had flown Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew on his plane, information used to impress investors. The witness admits to leaving investors alone in an office (without cameras) to view 'real pleadings' in the Epstein case to verify the scheme's legitimacy. The text also references email communications with Ken Jenne regarding the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017497.jpg
A deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein, discussing the internal operations of his law firm. The witness admits to 'creating this story for the investors' regarding a $7 million investment in a software system called 'Q-task'. He details relying on associates like Russ Adler and Stu Rosenfeldt for both legitimate and illegitimate activities, and describes the firm's surveillance systems and size (70 attorneys) in 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017495.jpg
This is a condensed deposition transcript (pages 18-21) involving an unnamed senior lawyer/partner testifying about the hiring of an attorney named Brad. The witness discusses their prior knowledge of the 'Epstein case,' describing Jeffrey Epstein as a 'billionaire' and an 'extremely collectible pedophile' representing significant financial value. The witness confirms discussing the case with Russ Adler, and possibly Farmer and Jaffe, before hiring Brad, but denies hiring Brad solely for the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017492.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 6-9) in which a witness (likely Scott Rothstein) admits to starting a Ponzi scheme around 2005 out of 'greed and the need to support the law firm.' The testimony details the history of his law firm's locations (One Financial Plaza, Colonial Bank Building, 401 Building) and partners (Stu Rosenfeldt, Susan Dolin, Michael Pancier). The witness clarifies that despite having approximately 70 attorneys and various people with 'partner' or 'shareholder' titles for 'prestige' and 'ego,' the only actual equity shareholders receiving distributions were himself and Stu Rosenfeldt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness (questioned by Mr. Edwards) is asked about previous statements regarding Virginia Roberts and potential lawsuits. The witness confirms stating they welcome the opportunity to cross-examine Roberts to prove her allegations are false. The witness also mentions receiving a 'nasty letter' from attorney Mr. Scarola regarding a waiver of the statute of limitations, which the witness declined to answer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015633.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It contains a transcript excerpt from a deposition where Alan Dershowitz questions Ms. McCawley's standing, followed by legal commentary regarding a statement released by Ms. McCawley on behalf of David Boies concerning privileged settlement discussions. The document references depositions of Alan Dershowitz from 2015 and 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.jpg
This document is an email from Mary E. Pirrotta to Lindsay Isaac (at Turner) dated January 22, 2015. It provides requested legal documents, specifically a complaint for Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Edwards vs. Dershowitz) and a letter from Mr. Scarola addressed to The Duke of York. The document bears Bates stamps BE-000029 and HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021955.jpg
This document is page 132 of a rough draft deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It captures the end of a questioning session where Mr. Simpson asks a witness if an adverse inference can be drawn solely from being on an airplane with a 24-year-old woman, to which the witness replies 'obviously not.' The session concludes at 4:31 p.m. with the attorneys agreeing to discuss logistics for the following day off the record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021954.jpg
This is page 131 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness identified as Mr. Cassell about the legality of a romantic relationship between a middle-aged man and a 24-year-old. The proceedings are interrupted by Mr. Scarola noting the time is 4:30, leading to a tense exchange between Mr. Scarola and Mr. Scott regarding whether Mr. Scott is smiling.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021953.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving the House Oversight Committee. Mr. Simpson questions a witness about a woman named Tatiana, specifically regarding her age during a specific flight, confirming she was over 18. The line of questioning then pivots to the legality and social perception of Jeffrey Epstein having a relationship with a 24-year-old woman, prompting an interjection from Mr. Scarola regarding the nature of such a relationship.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021952.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (page 129) marked with a House Oversight footer. The witness is being questioned about a woman named Tatiana, specifically regarding her age during a flight in 1998. The witness asserts they understood Tatiana to be 18 or older, while the questioning attorney suggests research indicates she was 24 at the time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021949.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft of a legal transcript, likely a deposition involving House Oversight. A witness is questioned about their knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with academics in Florida and New York, and specifically whether they knew Epstein had an office at Harvard (which the witness denies). The page concludes with an attorney, Mr. Scarola, interrupting to note that the session must end at 4:30 PM per a prior agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021947.jpg
This document is page 124 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. The witness, advised by attorney Mr. Scarola to invoke common interest privilege, refuses to answer whether their legal team communicated with Mr. Josefsburg. The testimony discusses a complaint signed by Josefsburg using the term 'academicians,' which the witness interprets as evidence against Alan Dershowitz, noting that a partner in Josefsburg's firm subsequently questioned Dershowitz about a sex abuse matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg
This document is page 122 of a rough draft transcript from a legal deposition, likely related to a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness (a former prosecutor from the Eastern District of Virginia) about the admissibility of a third party's Fifth Amendment invocation as evidence in criminal versus civil cases. Mr. Scarola is also present as counsel. The witness discusses their experience with approximately 20 trials involving drug dealers and gun runners but cannot recall specific instances of using the Fifth Amendment in the manner described.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). A witness is testifying about an event around July 2010 involving a client represented by themselves and Brad Edwards. The testimony is interrupted by a phone line, leading to the identification of Ken Sweder, Alan Dershowitz, and Darrin Indyke as listeners on the call.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021930.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation given the Bates stamp. An emotional witness (likely a victim) defends 'multiple girls' against attacks from the questioning attorney's side and requests a break. During the recess (4:01-4:04 p.m.), Mr. and Mrs. Dershowitz leave the room. Attorney Mr. Simpson then attempts to question Mr. Cassell, but is interrupted by Ms. McCawley noting the witness had stepped out for water.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021928.jpg
This is page 105 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. The testimony discusses the potential influence of a person 'fifth in line to the British Throne' over law enforcement in England and the US. The witness confirms relying on information regarding allegations about Virginia Roberts and a 'sex trafficking organization.' The page concludes with attorneys Scarola and Simpson making a comparative remark about Mr. Dershowitz's tendency to give long answers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021918.jpg
A page from a rough draft deposition transcript involving Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scarola, and a witness. The discussion centers on the introduction of a one-page document (partially typed with handwriting) into evidence, which is subsequently marked for identification as 'Cassell Exhibit 3'. The witness mentions a timeline involving 'December 30th'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021917.jpg
A page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing involving the House Oversight Committee. Mr. Simpson questions the witness, Mr. Cassell, about a document Cassell prepared to summarize his knowledge. They agree to mark this document as 'Exhibit 3' (Cassell 3), with Cassell clarifying that the document contains pre- and post-December 30th sections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021916.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving Professor Cassell. The witness testifies that Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards contacted a woman in Australia via telephone, who identified Alan Dershowitz as having information regarding Jeffrey Epstein and the sexual abuse of underage girls. During the questioning by Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scarola interrupts to assert that Professor Cassell is entitled to refresh his recollection before moving to a new subject.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021914.jpg
This page is a rough draft transcript, likely from a House Oversight proceeding, detailing attempts to depose Alan Dershowitz. The speaker notes a 2009 service of process and a specific 2011 note from Mr. Scarola to Dershowitz stating that 'multiple witnesses have placed you in the presence of Jeffrey Epstein and underage girls' and requesting a deposition on the matter. The speaker implies Dershowitz's response was not a straightforward denial.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021913.jpg
A page from a legal transcript where a witness discusses providing information relevant to the sexual abuse of underage girls. The witness becomes emotional, requests a break, and upon returning, expresses a desire to effectively support Virginia Roberts with evidence.
Difficulty contacting Carolyn
The government informed Mr. Scarola it was having difficulty contacting Carolyn.
Response to government's message
Mr. Scarola replied that he had forwarded the government's message to Carolyn.
Information about Carolyn
Mr. Scarola made statements to the government about Carolyn, which the document argues constitutes a waiver of attorney-client privilege.
No Subject
Mr. Scarola wrote answers to interrogatories which were signed by his client. The speaker argues these answers are not privileged.
N/A
Referenced as an attachment in the email.
Unknown
Mr. Scarola suggests ten topics for the interview with Carolyn
Interview Topics
Mr. Scarola suggests ten topics for the interview with Carolyn.
Courtroom Conduct
Discussion regarding Alan Dershowitz interrupting proceedings by standing up.
Document Handover
Mr. Scott provided a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book to Mr. Scarola, fulfilling a request made in a previous deposition.
Questioning regarding flight logs and relationships with ...
A transcript of a deposition where MR. SCAROLA questions an unnamed witness. The witness invokes constitutional rights for questions about flight logs and socializing with Donald Trump in the presence of minors, but confirms socializing with both Trump and Alan Dershowitz.
Questioning about flight logs, and relationships with Don...
A deposition Q&A where the witness is questioned about flight logs for a private jet and social interactions with Donald Trump and Alan Dershowitz. The witness invokes their constitutional rights to avoid answering questions about the flight logs and about socializing with Trump in the presence of underage females.
Questioning regarding flight logs and relationships with ...
A transcript of a deposition where MR. SCAROLA questions an unnamed witness. The witness invokes constitutional rights for questions about flight logs and socializing with Donald Trump in the presence of minors, but confirms socializing with both Trump and Alan Dershowitz.
Questioning about socializing with Alan Dershowitz and To...
Mr. Scarola questions the witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors, to which the witness pleads the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. Scarola then asks about socializing with Tommy Mottola, which the witness calls an irrelevant question brought by Mr. Edwards to harm his relationships.
Questioning about associations with Alan Dershowitz and T...
Mr. Scarola questions an unnamed witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors and with Tommy Mottola. The witness refuses to answer, citing constitutional rights, and complains the questions are irrelevant and intended to harm their personal relationships.
Questioning about socializing with Alan Dershowitz and To...
Mr. Scarola questions the witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors, to which the witness pleads the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. Scarola then asks about socializing with Tommy Mottola, which the witness calls an irrelevant question brought by Mr. Edwards to harm his relationships.
Waiver of statute of limitations
Described by the witness as a 'nasty letter' containing a waiver of the statute of limitations.
Discussion about Carolyn
Mr. Scarola spoke with the government for approximately ten minutes about Carolyn.
Follow-up to interviews
An email sent by Mr. Scarola on behalf of the witness as her agent, which was followed up by interviews with the government.
Interview preparation
Email containing bullet points for the government to interview about.
Interview topics
Email with bullet points for the government to interview about
Unsuccessful contact attempts
Mr. Scarola replied that his attempts to contact Carolyn were unsuccessful and provided her phone number.
Scheduling a meeting
Mr. Scarola contacted the government about scheduling a video conference meeting with himself and Carolyn for July 17, 2020.
Request to meet with Carolyn
The government informed Mr. Scarola that it wanted to meet with Carolyn.
Bullet points for interview
An email sent by Mr. Scarola in July 2020 containing bullet points for the government to interview the witness about.
Contact information for Carolyn
Mr. Scarola spoke with the government, which provided Special Agent Young's contact information for him to pass to Carolyn.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity